On 05/27/2010 05:44 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Candidate for stable too?
It should be safe to apply, but I didn't find any current users where
the mask was applied in a way where it was causing problems. Not sure if
you want the noise, or apply it as better safe than sorry?
The only use in fact
On 05/28/10 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 05/27/2010 05:44 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Candidate for stable too?
It should be safe to apply, but I didn't find any current users where
the mask was applied in a way where it was causing problems. Not sure if
you want the noise, or apply it as
On 05/27/2010 04:27 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 27.05.2010 15:46, schrieb jes.soren...@redhat.com:
From: Jes Sorensenjes.soren...@redhat.com
C defaults to int, so make definition of BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE 64 bit
safe as it and BDRV_SECTOR_MASK may be used against 64 bit addresses.
Signed-off-by: Jes
On 05/27/10 17:38, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 05/27/2010 04:27 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 27.05.2010 15:46, schrieb jes.soren...@redhat.com:
From: Jes Sorensenjes.soren...@redhat.com
C defaults to int, so make definition of BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE 64 bit
safe as it and BDRV_SECTOR_MASK may be used
