On 05/14/10 15:21, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/13/2010 03:32 AM, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensenjes.soren...@redhat.com
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
number, without any supporting text.
I'm not a huge fan of the name.
It was the
On 05/13/2010 03:32 AM, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensenjes.soren...@redhat.com
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
number, without any supporting text.
I'm not a huge fan of the name.
But what information are we trying to convey? Just
On 05/14/2010 09:21 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/13/2010 03:32 AM, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensenjes.soren...@redhat.com
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
number, without any supporting text.
I'm not a huge fan of the name.
But
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:21:55AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/13/2010 03:32 AM, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensenjes.soren...@redhat.com
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
number, without any supporting text.
I'm not a huge fan