On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 09:25:40PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
You're thinking in terms of which device to boot, which does make this
difficult. However, it's equally valid to think in terms of which
boot method to invoke,
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:01:25PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 09:25:40PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
You're thinking in terms of which device to boot, which does make this
difficult. However, it's
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:34:03PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:47:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:15:44PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
It's unclear to me how SeaBIOS is supposed to do that.
Suppose we have
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:55:09PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:50:45AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
If scsi card has optionrom with only one bcv then Seabios can determine
its boot order from device path, so why not provide user with this
option today?
It's
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:53:32PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:01:00PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:34:03PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:47:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you let go to the idea of exact
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:47:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:15:44PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
It's unclear to me how SeaBIOS is supposed to do that.
Suppose we have /p...@i0cf8/s...@3/d...@0,0 with boot index 5 in
boot devices list and suppose pci device in
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:50:45AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
If scsi card has optionrom with only one bcv then Seabios can determine
its boot order from device path, so why not provide user with this
option today?
It's unclear to me how SeaBIOS is supposed to do that.
Try to keep track of
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 04:01:00PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:34:03PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:47:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
If you let go to the idea of exact matching of string built by qemu in
Seabios it will be easy to see
Hi,
BTW are you actually aware of any option rom with multiple BCVs and, if
yes, how those BCVs differ?
Multiple BCVs - yes. A SCSI card will define a BCV for each attached
drive. I don't have a scsi card myself, but the support was added by
a user who ran into the problem first hand.
Hi,
If scsi card has optionrom with only one bcv then Seabios can determine
its boot order from device path, so why not provide user with this
option today?
It's unclear to me how SeaBIOS is supposed to do that.
Try to keep track of which bcv/bev belongs to which pci device? It
should
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:19:29AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
BTW are you actually aware of any option rom with multiple BCVs and, if
yes, how those BCVs differ?
Multiple BCVs - yes. A SCSI card will define a BCV for each attached
drive. I don't have a scsi card myself, but the
On 11/28/2010 09:54 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:38:36AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 09:54 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:39:13PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony,
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:45:34AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Suppose we add SCSI support to Seabios and suppose SCSI card Seabios can
natively boot from has
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:15:44PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:45:34AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Suppose we add SCSI support to
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:19:00PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:54:38PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:19:00PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:09:48PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:54:38PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:23:20PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:19:00PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:03:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:19:07PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:31:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
I am using open firmware naming scheme
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:41:10AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:03:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:19:07PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:31:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:43:47PM
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 06:22:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:41:10AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:03:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
BEV should be easy. When you register BEV found on pci card you search
for device path to that pci
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:49:39AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 06:22:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:41:10AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:03:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
BEV should be easy. When you
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 07:06:19PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:49:39AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 06:22:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Yeah. I looked at the Seabios code. The simplest would be to change
device path to point to rom
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:47:26PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 07:06:19PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:49:39AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 06:22:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Yeah. I looked at the Seabios code.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:47:26PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
I don't think seabios should try to parse the path. Instead, I think
seabios should build a name for each device it finds using the same
algorithm that qemu uses
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 01:40:12PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:47:26PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
I don't think seabios should try to parse the path. Instead, I think
seabios should build a name
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten around to
review it?
IOW, last call if you have
Trimming CC list, adding seabios list.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 01:40:12PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Qemu does not know that Seabios needs optionrom to boot from a
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Trimming CC list, adding seabios list.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 01:40:12PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:19:07PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Hi Gleb,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:31:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
My apologies - I haven't had time to review.
On Wed, Nov 17,
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
I am using open firmware naming scheme to specify device path names.
In this version: added SCSI bus support. Pass boot order list as file
to
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten around to
review it?
IOW, last call if you have objections :-)
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On Wed,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Anthony Liguori
aligu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten around to review
Hi Gleb,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:31:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
My apologies - I haven't had time to review.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
I am using open firmware
41 matches
Mail list logo
