On 03/16/2010 10:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
In the context of the RHEV management application, iSCSI/SCSI Fibre are
providing the raw storage, with LVM VGs on top and the carving LVs for
the guests. In the common case the admin/app would monitor VG usage& LV
rate of increase to ensure extr
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:05:40AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 05:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:38:02PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >>On 03/16/2010 12:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>
> Polling loops are an indication that somet
On 03/16/2010 05:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:38:02PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/16/2010 12:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Polling loops are an indication that something is wrong.
Except when people suggest they are the right answer, qc
On 03/16/2010 12:45 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:38:02PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/16/2010 12:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Polling loops are an indication that something is wrong.
Except when people suggest they are the right answer, qc
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:43:48AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 11:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:18:03AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >
> >>Chris Wright wrote:
> >>
> >>>Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >>>
On 03/16/2010 12:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Polling loops are an indication that something is wrong.
Except when people suggest they are the right answer, qcow high
watermark ;-P
I liked Anthony's suggestion of an lvm2 block format driver. No polling.
--
error compiling commi
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:38:02PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 12:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> Polling loops are an indication that something is wrong.
>>>
>> Except when people suggest they are the right answer, qcow high
>> watermark ;-P
>>
>
> I liked Anthony's sug
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:38:02PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 12:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>Polling loops are an indication that something is wrong.
> >>
> >Except when people suggest they are the right answer, qcow high
> >watermark ;-P
> >
>
> I liked Anthony's su
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:29:44AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:18:03AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > Chris Wright wrote:
> > > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
> >
> > Migration:
> > - flexible migration: I hope to sent an RFC pa
On 03/16/2010 11:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:18:03AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Migration:
- flexible migration: I hope to sent an RFC patch on time for the
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:18:03AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Chris Wright wrote:
> > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> Migration:
> - flexible migration: I hope to sent an RFC patch on time for the
> call. idea is to use subsections.
>
> - callbacks. bl
Chris Wright wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
Migration:
- flexible migration: I hope to sent an RFC patch on time for the
call. idea is to use subsections.
- callbacks. block migration introduced several callbacks:
* cancel()
* get_status()
* r
12 matches
Mail list logo
