David S. Ahern wrote:
On 04/13/2010 07:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
It still needs a lot of love, but definitely an improvement from the
last version. The biggest difference for the performance boost and
stability is discovering that the usbfs in linux limits transactions to
16k versus the
David S. Ahern wrote:
On 04/13/2010 05:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
David S. Ahern wrote:
After a month of code refactoring and clean ups, etc, I thought I would
send along an update. The attached patch is relative to your ehci
branch; I also attached the full usb-ehci.c file for easier
David S. Ahern wrote:
After a month of code refactoring and clean ups, etc, I thought I would
send along an update. The attached patch is relative to your ehci
branch; I also attached the full usb-ehci.c file for easier reading.
Thanks for your work! I applied it and once again merged git head
On 04/13/2010 05:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
David S. Ahern wrote:
After a month of code refactoring and clean ups, etc, I thought I would
send along an update. The attached patch is relative to your ehci
branch; I also attached the full usb-ehci.c file for easier reading.
Thanks for your
On 14.04.2010, at 01:50, David S. Ahern wrote:
On 04/13/2010 05:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
David S. Ahern wrote:
After a month of code refactoring and clean ups, etc, I thought I would
send along an update. The attached patch is relative to your ehci
branch; I also attached the full
On 04/13/2010 07:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
It still needs a lot of love, but definitely an improvement from the
last version. The biggest difference for the performance boost and
stability is discovering that the usbfs in linux limits transactions to
16k versus the EHCI spec which allows
