Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 06/04/2014 08:09 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Sounds like we have an off-by-one condition if empty files behave
differently from other files. We ought to fix that bug (not that your
normal guest will ever have a 0-length backing file, but this was what I
was
Am 05.06.2014 um 09:06 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 06/04/2014 08:09 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Sounds like we have an off-by-one condition if empty files behave
differently from other files. We ought to fix that bug (not that your
normal guest
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 05.06.2014 um 09:06 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 06/04/2014 08:09 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Sounds like we have an off-by-one condition if empty files behave
differently from other files. We ought to fix
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:06:42AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com writes:
On 06/04/2014 08:09 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Sounds like we have an off-by-one condition if empty files behave
differently from other files. We ought to fix that bug (not that your
Testing on Fedora 20 (JSON output slightly modified for legibility):
$ qemu-kvm --version
QEMU emulator version 2.0.0, Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard
$ touch f
$ qemu-kvm -qmp stdio -drive file=f
= {QMP: {version: {qemu: {micro: 0, minor: 0, major: 2},
package: }, capabilities: []}}
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 04:55:04PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Testing on Fedora 20 (JSON output slightly modified for legibility):
$ qemu-kvm --version
QEMU emulator version 2.0.0, Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard
$ touch f
$ qemu-kvm -qmp stdio -drive file=f
= {QMP: {version: {qemu:
On 06/04/2014 06:12 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
Huh? I thought that an active commit was not supposed to complete
automatically, but that the job would remain around until I either
'block-job-cancel' or 'block-job-complete' it. That is, I should have
gotten a BLOCK_JOB_READY event and still see the
On Wed, 06/04 19:54, Eric Blake wrote:
On 06/04/2014 06:12 PM, Jeff Cody wrote:
Huh? I thought that an active commit was not supposed to complete
automatically, but that the job would remain around until I either
'block-job-cancel' or 'block-job-complete' it. That is, I should have
On 06/04/2014 08:09 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Sounds like we have an off-by-one condition if empty files behave
differently from other files. We ought to fix that bug (not that your
normal guest will ever have a 0-length backing file, but this was what I
was trying to use for libvirt's probing of
On Wed, 06/04 20:55, Eric Blake wrote:
On 06/04/2014 08:09 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
Sounds like we have an off-by-one condition if empty files behave
differently from other files. We ought to fix that bug (not that your
normal guest will ever have a 0-length backing file, but this was what I
10 matches
Mail list logo
