Yeah, but I think if we have to take advantage of live vertical
scaling (memory hotplug, memory hotunplug, cpu hotplug) then we need
to upgrade to pc model 1.2.
pc model 1.0 will be incompatible with qemu 2.0 wrt. LVS feature as
the bus architecture and the way how dimms are handled has changed
Hi Andreas,
the point is that the machine version on the destination side needs
to match the source side. I hope this is just to avoid the licensing
issue. Else, in all other circumstance, we can specify different pc
models while migrating from source to destination.
Anshul Makkar
On Wed, Jul
Il 11/07/2014 12:14, Anshul Makkar ha scritto:
Hi Andreas,
the point is that the machine version on the destination side needs
to match the source side. I hope this is just to avoid the licensing
issue. Else, in all other circumstance, we can specify different pc
models while migrating from
[Top-quote moved to its rightful place; please do not top quote on
technical lists]
Anshul Makkar anshul.mak...@profitbricks.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 09.07.2014 13:09, schrieb Anshul Makkar:
Thanks. I got the point.
And for the
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
[Top-quote moved to its rightful place; please do not top quote on
technical lists]
Anshul Makkar anshul.mak...@profitbricks.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
ly, leaving your machine running on the source.
Hmm. Got the point.
But as I mentioned above if we have to use live vertical scaling on
qemu 2.0, then pc-model 1.0 won't help (as the dimm handling and bus
handling has
Eduardo Otubo eduardo.ot...@profitbricks.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
[Top-quote moved to its rightful place; please do not top quote on
technical lists]
Anshul Makkar anshul.mak...@profitbricks.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at
Anshul Makkar anshul.mak...@profitbricks.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
ly, leaving your machine running on the source.
Hmm. Got the point.
But as I mentioned above if we have to use live vertical scaling on
qemu 2.0, then pc-model
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Eduardo Otubo eduardo.ot...@profitbricks.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
[Top-quote moved to its rightful place; please do not top quote on
technical lists]
Eduardo Otubo eduardo.ot...@profitbricks.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Eduardo Otubo eduardo.ot...@profitbricks.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com
wrote:
[Top-quote moved to its rightful
On 07/08/2014 03:10 PM, Anshul Makkar wrote:
Hi,
Yeah, I am aware of this option. But the point where I am concerned is
that if Windows VM is running in QEMU 1.0 with pc-model 1.0 and then I
upgrade the QEMU to 2.0 and I specify machine as pc-1.2, then Windows
will see this as change in
Anshul Makkar anshul.mak...@profitbricks.com writes:
Hi,
Yeah, I am aware of this option. But the point where I am concerned is
that if Windows VM is running in QEMU 1.0 with pc-model 1.0 and then I
upgrade the QEMU to 2.0 and I specify machine as pc-1.2, then Windows
will see this as
Am 09.07.2014 13:09, schrieb Anshul Makkar:
Thanks. I got the point.
And for the record, the point is that the machine version on the
destination side needs to match the source side. So, if the default or
pc alias is used in 1.0, which resolves to pc-1.0, then it needs to be
pc-1.0, not pc-1.2.
original -
De: Anshul Makkar anshul.mak...@profitbricks.com
À: Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com
Cc: Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de, qemu-devel qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Juillet 2014 13:09:47
Objet: Re: [Qemu-devel] live migration + licensing issue.
Thanks. I got the point
Hi,
Yeah, I am aware of this option. But the point where I am concerned is
that if Windows VM is running in QEMU 1.0 with pc-model 1.0 and then I
upgrade the QEMU to 2.0 and I specify machine as pc-1.2, then Windows
will see this as change in hardware and complain about the license.
Sorry, if my
Thanks. I got the point.
Anshul Makkar
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Anshul Makkar anshul.mak...@profitbricks.com writes:
Hi,
Yeah, I am aware of this option. But the point where I am concerned is
that if Windows VM is running in QEMU 1.0 with
Hi,
In our data center we are using qemu 1.0/ 1.2 and we need to do a live
migration to qemu 2.0.
One of the main hindrance that we are facing is that QEMU 1.0 uses old
PC model so if a user using Windows on the VM running on QEMU 1.0 does
a live migrate to QEMU 2.0 , he will see a licensing
Hi,
Am 08.07.2014 17:24, schrieb Anshul Makkar:
In our data center we are using qemu 1.0/ 1.2 and we need to do a live
migration to qemu 2.0.
One of the main hindrance that we are facing is that QEMU 1.0 uses old
PC model so if a user using Windows on the VM running on QEMU 1.0 does
a live
18 matches
Mail list logo
