On Sun, Jun 24 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2007 07:00:03 Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > I realize releases are a bit out of fashion, but is there any way to go
> > > through cvs to track down which checkin broke this stuff? I can do it in
> > > git, mercurial, or subversion. But cvs i
On Saturday 23 June 2007 07:00:03 Jens Axboe wrote:
> > I realize releases are a bit out of fashion, but is there any way to go
> > through cvs to track down which checkin broke this stuff? I can do it in
> > git, mercurial, or subversion. But cvs isn't really set up for this sort
> > of thing...
On Saturday 23 June 2007 03:27:03 Alexander Graf wrote:
> I guess you're running on i586 then?
Athlon. (/proc/cpuinfo says "AMD Sempron(tm) 2200+")
> I only tried this on ppc.
> Last time I checked the code-copy stuff was broken, so maybe it helps
> to disable that?
What code-copy stuff? (
On Sat, Jun 23 2007, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2007 18:31:20 Rob Landley wrote:
> > Ok, it's a more fundamental problem:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys$ qemu-i386
> > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> >
> > Nothing to do with the program it's trying to run, it segfaults with no
> > ar
Rob Landley wrote:
Ok, it's a more fundamental problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys$ qemu-i386
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Nothing to do with the program it's trying to run, it segfaults with no
arguments.
Is anybody else seeing this?
Yes, I get it.
Rob
-Nigel
On Friday 22 June 2007 18:31:20 Rob Landley wrote:
> Ok, it's a more fundamental problem:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys$ qemu-i386
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> Nothing to do with the program it's trying to run, it segfaults with no
> arguments.
>
> Is anybody else seeing this?
>
> Rob
So I'
On Jun 23, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
On Friday 22 June 2007 19:13:19 Alexander Graf wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
Ok, it's a more fundamental problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys$ qemu-i386
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Nothing to do with the program it's trying to run, it segfaults
On Friday 22 June 2007 19:27:18 andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> > Well it works for me. I usually see this segfault when trying to compile
> > qemu with a gcc4. Try gcc3 and everything should be fine.
>
> I usually see this when I forget to rebuild all files affected by a
> recent change (because the M
On Friday 22 June 2007 19:13:19 Alexander Graf wrote:
> Rob Landley wrote:
> > Ok, it's a more fundamental problem:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys$ qemu-i386
> > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> >
> > Nothing to do with the program it's trying to run, it segfaults with no
> > arguments.
> >
> > I
On 23/06/07, Alexander Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob Landley wrote:
> Ok, it's a more fundamental problem:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys$ qemu-i386
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> Nothing to do with the program it's trying to run, it segfaults with no
> arguments.
>
> Is anybody else se
Rob Landley wrote:
> Ok, it's a more fundamental problem:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys$ qemu-i386
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> Nothing to do with the program it's trying to run, it segfaults with no
> arguments.
>
> Is anybody else seeing this?
>
> Rob
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/vm/qemu-devel
Ok, it's a more fundamental problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sys$ qemu-i386
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Nothing to do with the program it's trying to run, it segfaults with no
arguments.
Is anybody else seeing this?
Rob
--
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
Problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/firmware/firmware$ build/temp-i686/hello
Hello world!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/firmware/firmware$ qemu-i386 build/temp-i686/hello
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
This is on a cvs snapshot from 15 minutes ago. The hello world is a
statically linked executable built again
13 matches
Mail list logo
