On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 07:31, Matwey V. Kornilov
wrote:
>
> пт, 11 янв. 2019 г. в 22:24, Matwey V. Kornilov :
> > Indeed, qemu-arm from master runs for 4 minutes where 2.11 runs for 2
> > hours for me. It is impressive improvement.
>
> I've managed to bisected the first good (fast) commit:
>
>
пн, 14 янв. 2019 г. в 13:24, Peter Maydell :
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 07:31, Matwey V. Kornilov
> wrote:
> >
> > пт, 11 янв. 2019 г. в 22:24, Matwey V. Kornilov :
> > > Indeed, qemu-arm from master runs for 4 minutes where 2.11 runs for 2
> > > hours for me. It is impressive improvement.
> >
>
пт, 11 янв. 2019 г. в 22:24, Matwey V. Kornilov :
>
> пт, 11 янв. 2019 г. в 12:52, Peter Maydell :
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 19:33, Matwey V. Kornilov
> > wrote:
> > > I am running the same application compiled for aarch64 and armv7l on
> > > x86_64 platform using qemu-user-linux tools.
> >
пт, 11 янв. 2019 г. в 12:52, Peter Maydell :
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 19:33, Matwey V. Kornilov
> wrote:
> > I am running the same application compiled for aarch64 and armv7l on
> > x86_64 platform using qemu-user-linux tools.
> >
> > I see dramatic performance difference (30 times) between
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 19:33, Matwey V. Kornilov
wrote:
> I am running the same application compiled for aarch64 and armv7l on
> x86_64 platform using qemu-user-linux tools.
>
> I see dramatic performance difference (30 times) between emulated
> architectures: aarch64 runs for ~4 minutes, armv7l
Hello,
I am running the same application compiled for aarch64 and armv7l on
x86_64 platform using qemu-user-linux tools.
I see dramatic performance difference (30 times) between emulated
architectures: aarch64 runs for ~4 minutes, armv7l runs for ~2 hours.
I do understand that CPU architecture
