On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 07:54:30AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2014-08-01 19:16, Alex Williamson wrote:
Also, it may let some of our device
models deviate from their real versions (I suppose, e.g., none of the
e1000 devices we currently emulate exposed FLR).
Of course, but what are
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 09:35 +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Alex,
2014-07-30 22:46 GMT+08:00 Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 22:16 +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Michael,
2014-07-30 21:16 GMT+08:00 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 09:25 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 09:35 +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Alex,
2014-07-30 22:46 GMT+08:00 Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 22:16 +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Michael,
2014-07-30 21:16 GMT+08:00
On 2014-08-01 18:35, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 09:25 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 09:35 +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Alex,
2014-07-30 22:46 GMT+08:00 Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 22:16 +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 18:39 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2014-08-01 18:35, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 09:25 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 09:35 +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Alex,
2014-07-30 22:46 GMT+08:00 Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com:
2014-08-01 23:25 GMT+08:00 Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com:
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 09:35 +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Alex,
2014-07-30 22:46 GMT+08:00 Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 22:16 +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Michael,
2014-07-30 21:16
On 2014-08-01 19:16, Alex Williamson wrote:
Also, it may let some of our device
models deviate from their real versions (I suppose, e.g., none of the
e1000 devices we currently emulate exposed FLR).
Of course, but what are the chances that the driver will care?
No drivers of GPOSes, but
Hi Alex,
2014-07-30 22:46 GMT+08:00 Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com:
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 22:16 +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Michael,
2014-07-30 21:16 GMT+08:00 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:24:04PM +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi,
I am testing vfio in L1
Hi,
I am testing vfio in L1 with my VT-d emulation project. I assigned one
of the two AHCI controllers in L1 to L2 via vfio. After I ran the QEMU
in L1, it complains that:
qemu-system-x86_64: vfio: Cannot reset device :00:03.0, no
available reset mechanism.
qemu-system-x86_64: vfio: Cannot
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:24:04PM +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi,
I am testing vfio in L1 with my VT-d emulation project. I assigned one
of the two AHCI controllers in L1 to L2 via vfio. After I ran the QEMU
in L1, it complains that:
qemu-system-x86_64: vfio: Cannot reset device :00:03.0, no
Hi Michael,
2014-07-30 21:16 GMT+08:00 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:24:04PM +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi,
I am testing vfio in L1 with my VT-d emulation project. I assigned one
of the two AHCI controllers in L1 to L2 via vfio. After I ran the QEMU
in L1, it
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 22:16 +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Michael,
2014-07-30 21:16 GMT+08:00 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:24:04PM +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi,
I am testing vfio in L1 with my VT-d emulation project. I assigned one
of the two AHCI controllers in
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:16:32PM +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi Michael,
2014-07-30 21:16 GMT+08:00 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:24:04PM +0800, Le Tan wrote:
Hi,
I am testing vfio in L1 with my VT-d emulation project. I assigned one
of the two AHCI
13 matches
Mail list logo