Re: [Qemu-devel] yet another proposed solution for gcc 4.x

2006-06-05 Thread Christian MICHON
On 6/4/06, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: PS. eventhough it wasn't the cleanest build, gcc-4.1.1 when used to build everything but op.c resulted in working binaries on my gentoo 2006.0 amd64 system. did you get better benchmark results than using gcc-3.x ? -- Christian

[Qemu-devel] yet another proposed solution for gcc 4.x

2006-06-04 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Greetings, attached patch, adds a ./configure option for setting the C compiler that will be used to build op.c for each of the targets; letting the user compile everything else with gcc 4.x if configured as the default C compiler while isolating the opcode generation which currently relies in

Re: [Qemu-devel] yet another proposed solution for gcc 4.x

2006-06-04 Thread Paul Brook
On Sunday 04 June 2006 09:59, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: Greetings, attached patch, adds a ./configure option for setting the C compiler that will be used to build op.c for each of the targets; letting the user compile everything else with gcc 4.x if configured as the default C

Re: [Qemu-devel] yet another proposed solution for gcc 4.x

2006-06-04 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
SNIP Why bother? As you say gcc4 has issues other than just op.c, so why not just compile everything with the old gcc? using the new gcc for the parts that can compile with it, could lead to better performance in some cases, as well to help clean up the code for conformance to newer standards