Re: [RFC] gitlab: introduce s390x wasmtime job

2022-12-19 Thread Alex Bennée
Ilya Leoshkevich writes: > On Fri, 2022-12-16 at 15:10 +, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Ilya Leoshkevich writes: >> >> > On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 15:40 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 15:37, Ilya Leoshkevich >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 14:57

Re: [RFC] gitlab: introduce s390x wasmtime job

2022-12-19 Thread Ilya Leoshkevich
On Fri, 2022-12-16 at 15:10 +, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Ilya Leoshkevich writes: > > > On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 15:40 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 15:37, Ilya Leoshkevich > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 14:57 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > >

Re: [RFC] gitlab: introduce s390x wasmtime job

2022-12-16 Thread Alex Bennée
Ilya Leoshkevich writes: > On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 15:40 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 15:37, Ilya Leoshkevich >> wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 14:57 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 14:04, Daniel P. Berrangé >> > > >> > > wrote: >> > >

Re: [RFC] gitlab: introduce s390x wasmtime job

2022-07-05 Thread Ilya Leoshkevich
On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 15:40 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 15:37, Ilya Leoshkevich > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 14:57 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 14:04, Daniel P. Berrangé > > > > > > wrote: > > > > If we put this job in QEMU CI someone

Re: [RFC] gitlab: introduce s390x wasmtime job

2022-07-05 Thread Peter Maydell
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 15:37, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 14:57 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 14:04, Daniel P. Berrangé > > wrote: > > > If we put this job in QEMU CI someone will have to be able to > > > interpret the results when it fails. > > > >

Re: [RFC] gitlab: introduce s390x wasmtime job

2022-07-05 Thread Ilya Leoshkevich
On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 14:57 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 14:04, Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > If we put this job in QEMU CI someone will have to be able to > > interpret the results when it fails. > > In particular since this is qemu-user, the answer is probably > at

Re: [RFC] gitlab: introduce s390x wasmtime job

2022-07-05 Thread Ilya Leoshkevich
On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 13:58 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 12:48:44AM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > wasmtime is a WebAssembly runtime, which includes a large > > testsuite. > > This testsuite uses qemu-user (aarch64 and s390x are supported) in > > order to exercise

Re: [RFC] gitlab: introduce s390x wasmtime job

2022-07-05 Thread Peter Maydell
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 14:04, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > If we put this job in QEMU CI someone will have to be able to > interpret the results when it fails. In particular since this is qemu-user, the answer is probably at least some of the time going to be "oh, well, qemu-user isn't reliable if

Re: [RFC] gitlab: introduce s390x wasmtime job

2022-07-05 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 12:48:44AM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > wasmtime is a WebAssembly runtime, which includes a large testsuite. > This testsuite uses qemu-user (aarch64 and s390x are supported) in > order to exercise foreign architectures. So you're saying that WebAssembly itself is

[RFC] gitlab: introduce s390x wasmtime job

2022-07-04 Thread Ilya Leoshkevich
wasmtime is a WebAssembly runtime, which includes a large testsuite. This testsuite uses qemu-user (aarch64 and s390x are supported) in order to exercise foreign architectures. Over time it found several regressions in qemu itself, and it would be beneficial to catch the similar ones earlier. To