On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 05:13:09PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_init() initializes queue notifiers
for queues "dev->vq_index" to queue "dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs",
whereas vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_uninit() uninitializes the
same notifiers for queue "0" to queue
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:33 PM Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> On 14/02/2022 04:20, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 12:13 AM Laurent Vivier wrote:
> >>
> >> vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_init() initializes queue notifiers
> >> for queues "dev->vq_index" to queue "dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs",
On 14/02/2022 04:20, Jason Wang wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 12:13 AM Laurent Vivier wrote:
vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_init() initializes queue notifiers
for queues "dev->vq_index" to queue "dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs",
whereas vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_uninit() uninitializes the
same
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 12:13 AM Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_init() initializes queue notifiers
> for queues "dev->vq_index" to queue "dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs",
> whereas vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_uninit() uninitializes the
> same notifiers for queue "0" to queue
vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_init() initializes queue notifiers
for queues "dev->vq_index" to queue "dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs",
whereas vhost_vdpa_host_notifiers_uninit() uninitializes the
same notifiers for queue "0" to queue "dev->nvqs".
This asymmetry seems buggy, fix that by using dev->vq_index
