Re: [RFC PATCH 02/10] accel: Use qemu_security_policy_taint(), mark KVM and Xen as safe

2021-10-21 Thread Markus Armbruster
It's been a while... Daniel P. Berrangé writes: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 01:20:16AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> Add the AccelClass::secure_policy_supported field to classify >> safe (within security boundary) vs unsafe accelerators. >> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé >>

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/10] accel: Use qemu_security_policy_taint(), mark KVM and Xen as safe

2021-09-09 Thread Eric Blake
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 01:20:16AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Add the AccelClass::secure_policy_supported field to classify > safe (within security boundary) vs unsafe accelerators. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > --- > include/qemu/accel.h | 5 + >

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/10] accel: Use qemu_security_policy_taint(), mark KVM and Xen as safe

2021-09-09 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 01:20:16AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Add the AccelClass::secure_policy_supported field to classify > safe (within security boundary) vs unsafe accelerators. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > --- > include/qemu/accel.h | 5 + >

[RFC PATCH 02/10] accel: Use qemu_security_policy_taint(), mark KVM and Xen as safe

2021-09-08 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Add the AccelClass::secure_policy_supported field to classify safe (within security boundary) vs unsafe accelerators. Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- include/qemu/accel.h | 5 + accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 1 + accel/xen/xen-all.c | 1 + softmmu/vl.c | 3 +++ 4 files changed,