It's been a while...
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 01:20:16AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Add the AccelClass::secure_policy_supported field to classify
>> safe (within security boundary) vs unsafe accelerators.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>>
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 01:20:16AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Add the AccelClass::secure_policy_supported field to classify
> safe (within security boundary) vs unsafe accelerators.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> ---
> include/qemu/accel.h | 5 +
>
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 01:20:16AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Add the AccelClass::secure_policy_supported field to classify
> safe (within security boundary) vs unsafe accelerators.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> ---
> include/qemu/accel.h | 5 +
>
Add the AccelClass::secure_policy_supported field to classify
safe (within security boundary) vs unsafe accelerators.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
include/qemu/accel.h | 5 +
accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 1 +
accel/xen/xen-all.c | 1 +
softmmu/vl.c | 3 +++
4 files changed,