On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 04:06:58PM +0300, Andrey Zhadchenko wrote:
> Thanks for the review!
>
> On 10/4/22 21:45, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:55:27PM +0300, Andrey Zhadchenko wrote:
> > > Although QEMU virtio is quite fast, there is still some room for
> > >
Thanks for the review!
On 10/4/22 21:45, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:55:27PM +0300, Andrey Zhadchenko wrote:
Although QEMU virtio is quite fast, there is still some room for
improvements. Disk latency can be reduced if we handle virito-blk requests
in host kernel istead
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:55:27PM +0300, Andrey Zhadchenko wrote:
> Although QEMU virtio is quite fast, there is still some room for
> improvements. Disk latency can be reduced if we handle virito-blk requests
> in host kernel istead of passing them to QEMU. The patch adds vhost-blk
> backend
Although QEMU virtio is quite fast, there is still some room for
improvements. Disk latency can be reduced if we handle virito-blk requests
in host kernel istead of passing them to QEMU. The patch adds vhost-blk
backend which sets up vhost-blk kernel module to process requests.
test setup and
