On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 3:44 PM Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 4:18 AM Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:10 PM Eugenio Perez Martin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 6:26 AM Jason Wang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 2:44 AM
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 4:18 AM Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:10 PM Eugenio Perez Martin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 6:26 AM Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 2:44 AM Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This allows it to test if the guest has
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 4:10 PM Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 6:26 AM Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 2:44 AM Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> > >
> > > This allows it to test if the guest has aknowledge an invalid transport
> > > feature for SVQ. This will
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 6:26 AM Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 2:44 AM Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> >
> > This allows it to test if the guest has aknowledge an invalid transport
> > feature for SVQ. This will include packed vq layout or event_idx,
> > where VirtIO device needs help from
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 2:44 AM Eugenio Pérez wrote:
>
> This allows it to test if the guest has aknowledge an invalid transport
> feature for SVQ. This will include packed vq layout or event_idx,
> where VirtIO device needs help from SVQ.
>
> There is not needed at this moment, but since SVQ
This allows it to test if the guest has aknowledge an invalid transport
feature for SVQ. This will include packed vq layout or event_idx,
where VirtIO device needs help from SVQ.
There is not needed at this moment, but since SVQ will not re-negotiate
features again with the guest, a failure in
