Re: QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-05-20 Thread John Snow
On 5/20/20 2:13 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 20/05/2020 01.06, John Snow wrote: >> >> >> On 5/19/20 5:04 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 03:56:36PM -0400, John Snow wrote: On 5/15/20 6:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at

Re: QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-05-20 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 08:13:07AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 20/05/2020 01.06, John Snow wrote: > > > > > > On 5/19/20 5:04 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 03:56:36PM -0400, John Snow wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 5/15/20 6:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On

Re: QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-05-20 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 07:06:40PM -0400, John Snow wrote: > > > On 5/19/20 5:04 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 03:56:36PM -0400, John Snow wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 5/15/20 6:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:11:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth

Re: QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-05-20 Thread Thomas Huth
On 20/05/2020 01.06, John Snow wrote: > > > On 5/19/20 5:04 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 03:56:36PM -0400, John Snow wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 5/15/20 6:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:11:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 07/04/2020

Re: QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-05-19 Thread John Snow
On 5/19/20 5:04 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 03:56:36PM -0400, John Snow wrote: >> >> >> On 5/15/20 6:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:11:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: On 07/04/2020 12.59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hello,

Re: QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-05-19 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 03:56:36PM -0400, John Snow wrote: > > > On 5/15/20 6:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:11:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> On 07/04/2020 12.59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> Following Markus thread on deprecating

Re: QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-05-18 Thread John Snow
On 5/15/20 6:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:11:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 07/04/2020 12.59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Following Markus thread on deprecating unmaintained (untested) code >>> (machines) [1] and the effort done to

Re: QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-05-15 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 15/05/20 12:51, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> If a qtest is feasible, yes, I think we should require one for new >> devices. > qtest is not feasible, at least not for all kinds of devices. You can't > talk to usb devices for example, and changing that effectively requires > writing

Re: QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-05-15 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:11:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 07/04/2020 12.59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Following Markus thread on deprecating unmaintained (untested) code > > (machines) [1] and the effort done to gather the information shared in > > the replies [2],

Re: QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-05-15 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:11:17PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 07/04/2020 12.59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Following Markus thread on deprecating unmaintained (untested) code > > (machines) [1] and the effort done to gather the information shared in > > the replies [2],

Re: QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-05-15 Thread Thomas Huth
On 07/04/2020 12.59, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hello, > > Following Markus thread on deprecating unmaintained (untested) code > (machines) [1] and the effort done to gather the information shared in > the replies [2], and the various acceptance tests added, is it > feasible to require for

QEMU 5.1: Can we require each new device/machine to provided a test?

2020-04-07 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Hello, Following Markus thread on deprecating unmaintained (untested) code (machines) [1] and the effort done to gather the information shared in the replies [2], and the various acceptance tests added, is it feasible to require for the next release that each new device/machine is provided a test