a...@redhat.com;
>phi...@linaro.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: Optimize replay of guest mapping
>
>On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:04:56AM +, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
>> >> @@ -1936,7 +1935,7 @@ void
>> >> memory_region_iommu_replay(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 07:04:56AM +, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:
> >> @@ -1936,7 +1935,7 @@ void
> >> memory_region_iommu_replay(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu_mr,
> >IOMMUNotifier
> >> *n)
> >>
> >> granularity = memory_region_iommu_get_min_page_size(iommu_mr);
> >>
> >> -for (addr = 0; addr <
com; da...@redhat.com; phi...@linaro.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: Optimize replay of guest mapping
>
>On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:43 AM Zhenzhong Duan
> wrote:
>>
>> On x86, there are two notifiers registered due to vtd-ir memory region
>> splitting the whol
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:43 AM Zhenzhong Duan
wrote:
>
> On x86, there are two notifiers registered due to vtd-ir memory region
> splitting the whole address space. During replay of the address space
> for each notifier, the whole address space is scanned which is
> unnecessory.
>
> We only
