> > /* Config size before the discard support (hide associated config
> > fields) */ #define VIRTIO_BLK_CFG_SIZE offsetof(struct
> > virtio_blk_config, \ @@ -1222,6 +1223,8 @@ static void
> virtio_blk_device_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > for (i = 0; i < conf->num_queues; i++)
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 06:19:50PM +0900, Hiroki Narukawa wrote:
> Coroutine pool size was 64 from long ago, and the basis was organized in the
> commit message in c740ad92.
>
> At that time, virtio-blk queue-size and num-queue were not configuable, and
> equivalent values were 128 and 1.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 05:20:57PM +0900, Hiroki Narukawa wrote:
>
> Phil, thanks for notifying me.
>
> > Coroutine pool size was 64 from long ago, and the basis was organized in
> > the commit message in c740ad92.
> >
> > At that time, virtio-blk queue-size and num-queue were not
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 05:20:57PM +0900, Hiroki Narukawa wrote:
Phil, thanks for notifying me.
> Coroutine pool size was 64 from long ago, and the basis was organized in the
> commit message in c740ad92.
>
> At that time, virtio-blk queue-size and num-queue were not configuable, and
>
Cc'ing Stefan / Paolo.
On 6/1/22 09:20, Hiroki Narukawa wrote:
Coroutine pool size was 64 from long ago, and the basis was organized in the
commit message in c740ad92.
At that time, virtio-blk queue-size and num-queue were not configuable, and
equivalent values were 128 and 1.
Coroutine
