On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 01:37:20PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 1/11/22 03:22, Yang Zhong wrote:
> > Thanks Kevin, I will update this in next version.
>
> Also:
>
> The extended state subleaves (EAX=0Dh, ECX=n, n>1).ECX[1]
> indicate whether the extended state component locates
>
On 1/11/22 03:22, Yang Zhong wrote:
Thanks Kevin, I will update this in next version.
Also:
The extended state subleaves (EAX=0Dh, ECX=n, n>1).ECX[1]
indicate whether the extended state component locates
on the next 64-byte boundary following the preceding state
component wh
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 04:20:41PM +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Zhong, Yang
> > Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 5:31 PM
> >
> > From: Jing Liu
> >
> > The extended state subleaves (EAX=0Dh, ECX=n, n>1).ECX[1]
> > are all zero, while spec actually introduces that bit 01
> > should indicate if
> From: Zhong, Yang
> Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 5:31 PM
>
> From: Jing Liu
>
> The extended state subleaves (EAX=0Dh, ECX=n, n>1).ECX[1]
> are all zero, while spec actually introduces that bit 01
> should indicate if the extended state component locates
> on the next 64-byte boundary follow
