On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:17:07PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 30.01.2023 um 15:58 hat Daniel P. Berrangé geschrieben:
> > > I'm at a point where I can take a shot at implementing this, but want
> > > some feedback on whether it is better to try to shoehorn a generic
> > > solution into the
Am 30.01.2023 um 15:58 hat Daniel P. Berrangé geschrieben:
> > I'm at a point where I can take a shot at implementing this, but want
> > some feedback on whether it is better to try to shoehorn a generic
> > solution into the existing @fd member of the SocketAddressType union,
> > or whether it
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:45:08PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> which is LISTEN_FDS=2, LISTEN_FDNAMES=control,vnc
Colon for separating the elements not comma.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:58:01PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > I'm at a point where I can take a shot at implementing this, but want
> > some feedback on whether it is better to try to shoehorn a generic
> > solution into the existing @fd member of the SocketAddressType union,
> > or
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 03:44:48PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:58:01PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Obviously at startup QEMU can trivially inherit the FDs from whatever
> > spawned it. The only task is to identify the FDs that are passed into,
> > and
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:58:01PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Obviously at startup QEMU can trivially inherit the FDs from whatever
> spawned it. The only task is to identify the FDs that are passed into,
> and systemd defined a mechanism for this using LISTEN_FDNAMES. IOW the
> socket
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 03:26:15PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055229, the question
> was raised on how to make qemu-storage-daemon sufficiently powerful to
> be a full-blown replacement to qemu-nbd. One of the features still
> lacking is the ability
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 03:26:15PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055229, the question
> was raised on how to make qemu-storage-daemon sufficiently powerful to
> be a full-blown replacement to qemu-nbd. One of the features still
> lacking is the ability
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2055229, the question
was raised on how to make qemu-storage-daemon sufficiently powerful to
be a full-blown replacement to qemu-nbd. One of the features still
lacking is the ability to do systemd socket activation (qemu-nbd does
this,
