On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 at 05:35, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
> 18.06.2024 16:55, Zheyu Ma wrote:
> > This commit adds validation checks for the MCOPRE and MCOSEL values in
> > the rcc_update_cfgr_register function. If the MCOPRE value exceeds
> > 0b100 or the MCOSEL value exceeds 0b111, an error is logg
18.06.2024 16:55, Zheyu Ma wrote:
This commit adds validation checks for the MCOPRE and MCOSEL values in
the rcc_update_cfgr_register function. If the MCOPRE value exceeds
0b100 or the MCOSEL value exceeds 0b111, an error is logged and the
corresponding clock mux is disabled. This helps in identi
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 13:59, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 at 14:56, Zheyu Ma wrote:
> >
> > This commit adds validation checks for the MCOPRE and MCOSEL values in
> > the rcc_update_cfgr_register function. If the MCOPRE value exceeds
> > 0b100 or the MCOSEL value exceeds 0b111, a
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 16:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> On 18/6/24 15:55, Zheyu Ma wrote:
> > This commit adds validation checks for the MCOPRE and MCOSEL values in
> > the rcc_update_cfgr_register function. If the MCOPRE value exceeds
> > 0b100 or the MCOSEL value exceeds 0b111, an error
On 18/6/24 15:55, Zheyu Ma wrote:
This commit adds validation checks for the MCOPRE and MCOSEL values in
the rcc_update_cfgr_register function. If the MCOPRE value exceeds
0b100 or the MCOSEL value exceeds 0b111, an error is logged and the
corresponding clock mux is disabled. This helps in identi
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 at 14:56, Zheyu Ma wrote:
>
> This commit adds validation checks for the MCOPRE and MCOSEL values in
> the rcc_update_cfgr_register function. If the MCOPRE value exceeds
> 0b100 or the MCOSEL value exceeds 0b111, an error is logged and the
> corresponding clock mux is disabled.
