Richard Henderson writes:
> On 4/1/24 10:39, Sven Schnelle wrote:
>> Richard Henderson writes:
For unknown reasons, Java 1.5 on 64-bit HP-UX 11.11 does signed
computation of the new IAOQ value in the signal handler. In the
current code these bits are not masked when returning to
On 4/1/24 10:39, Sven Schnelle wrote:
Richard Henderson writes:
On 4/1/24 04:52, Sven Schnelle wrote:
For unknown reasons, Java 1.5 on 64-bit HP-UX 11.11 does signed
computation of the new IAOQ value in the signal handler. In the
current code these bits are not masked when returning to
On 4/1/24 10:56, Sven Schnelle wrote:
This seems to be caused by IIAOQ's containing the upper bits. With the
patch below i'm able to boot. Not sure whether it's correct though.
diff --git a/target/hppa/int_helper.c b/target/hppa/int_helper.c
index 58c13d3e61..f7c4cca8f1 100644
---
Sven Schnelle writes:
> Sven Schnelle writes:
>
>> Richard Henderson writes:
>>
>>> On 4/1/24 04:52, Sven Schnelle wrote:
For unknown reasons, Java 1.5 on 64-bit HP-UX 11.11 does signed
computation of the new IAOQ value in the signal handler. In the
current code these bits are
Sven Schnelle writes:
> Richard Henderson writes:
>
>> On 4/1/24 04:52, Sven Schnelle wrote:
>>> For unknown reasons, Java 1.5 on 64-bit HP-UX 11.11 does signed
>>> computation of the new IAOQ value in the signal handler. In the
>>> current code these bits are not masked when returning to
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 4/1/24 04:52, Sven Schnelle wrote:
>> For unknown reasons, Java 1.5 on 64-bit HP-UX 11.11 does signed
>> computation of the new IAOQ value in the signal handler. In the
>> current code these bits are not masked when returning to narrow
>> mode, causing java to
On 4/1/24 04:52, Sven Schnelle wrote:
For unknown reasons, Java 1.5 on 64-bit HP-UX 11.11 does signed
computation of the new IAOQ value in the signal handler. In the
current code these bits are not masked when returning to narrow
mode, causing java to crash.
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle
---
