Re: [PATCH 1/4] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation

On 2023/10/18 14:53, LIU Zhiwei wrote: +CC Richard On 2023/10/17 11:37, Akihiko Odaki wrote: On 2023/10/17 11:29, LIU Zhiwei wrote: On 2023/10/12 13:42, Akihiko Odaki wrote: It is initialized with a simple assignment and there is little room for error. In fact, the validation is even more

Re: [PATCH 1/4] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation

+CC Richard On 2023/10/17 11:37, Akihiko Odaki wrote: On 2023/10/17 11:29, LIU Zhiwei wrote: On 2023/10/12 13:42, Akihiko Odaki wrote: It is initialized with a simple assignment and there is little room for error. In fact, the validation is even more complex. Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki

Re: [PATCH 1/4] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation

On 2023/10/17 11:29, LIU Zhiwei wrote: On 2023/10/12 13:42, Akihiko Odaki wrote: It is initialized with a simple assignment and there is little room for error. In fact, the validation is even more complex. Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki ---   target/riscv/cpu.c | 13 ++---   1 file

Re: [PATCH 1/4] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation

On 2023/10/12 13:42, Akihiko Odaki wrote: It is initialized with a simple assignment and there is little room for error. In fact, the validation is even more complex. Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki --- target/riscv/cpu.c | 13 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH 1/4] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation

On 10/12/23 02:42, Akihiko Odaki wrote: It is initialized with a simple assignment and there is little room for error. In fact, the validation is even more complex. Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki --- target/riscv/cpu.c | 13 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)