Thomas Huth writes:
> On 27/05/2020 18.36, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Thomas Huth writes:
>>
>>> On 27/05/2020 16.44, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 25/05/2020 à 15:18, Thomas Huth a écrit :
> From: Alex Bennée
>
> Newer clangs rightly spot that you can never exceed the full
On 27/05/2020 18.36, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Thomas Huth writes:
>
>> On 27/05/2020 16.44, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> Le 25/05/2020 à 15:18, Thomas Huth a écrit :
From: Alex Bennée
Newer clangs rightly spot that you can never exceed the full address
space of 64 bit hosts
Thomas Huth writes:
> On 27/05/2020 16.44, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 25/05/2020 à 15:18, Thomas Huth a écrit :
>>> From: Alex Bennée
>>>
>>> Newer clangs rightly spot that you can never exceed the full address
>>> space of 64 bit hosts with:
>>>
>>> linux-user/elfload.c:2076:41: error:
On 27/05/2020 16.44, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 25/05/2020 à 15:18, Thomas Huth a écrit :
>> From: Alex Bennée
>>
>> Newer clangs rightly spot that you can never exceed the full address
>> space of 64 bit hosts with:
>>
>> linux-user/elfload.c:2076:41: error: result of comparison 'unsigned
>>
Le 25/05/2020 à 15:18, Thomas Huth a écrit :
> From: Alex Bennée
>
> Newer clangs rightly spot that you can never exceed the full address
> space of 64 bit hosts with:
>
> linux-user/elfload.c:2076:41: error: result of comparison 'unsigned
> long' > 18446744073709551615 is always false
>
