Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation

2019-11-28 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/1574935984-16910-1-git-send-email-pmo...@linux.ibm.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Subject: [PATCH v1 0/1] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Type: series Message-id:

Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation

2019-11-28 Thread Pierre Morel
On 2019-11-28 13:28, Janosch Frank wrote: On 11/28/19 11:13 AM, Pierre Morel wrote: A new proposition: I think it would be wise to fork directly from handle_instruction instead to accept per default all instructions with with secure instruction interception code. Just in case future firmware

Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation

2019-11-28 Thread Janosch Frank
On 11/28/19 11:13 AM, Pierre Morel wrote: > A new proposition: > I think it would be wise to fork directly from handle_instruction > instead to accept per default all instructions with with secure > instruction interception code. > Just in case future firmware with older QEMU. > > How ever I let