On 30.04.20 15:56, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 30.04.2020 14:47, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 30.04.20 11:48, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 30.04.2020 11:26, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.04.20 15:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 29.04.2020 15:17, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 29.04.20
On 30.04.2020 14:47, Max Reitz wrote:
On 30.04.20 11:48, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
On 30.04.2020 11:26, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.04.20 15:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
29.04.2020 15:17, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.04.20 12:37, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
29.04.2020 13:24, Max
On 30.04.20 11:48, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 30.04.2020 11:26, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 29.04.20 15:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> 29.04.2020 15:17, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.04.20 12:37, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 29.04.2020 13:24, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On
On 30.04.2020 11:26, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.04.20 15:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
29.04.2020 15:17, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.04.20 12:37, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
29.04.2020 13:24, Max Reitz wrote:
On 28.04.20 22:00, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces
On 29.04.20 15:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 29.04.2020 15:17, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 29.04.20 12:37, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> 29.04.2020 13:24, Max Reitz wrote:
On 28.04.20 22:00, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
On 4/29/20 8:02 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
+ /*
+ * The compressed stream from the input buffer may consist of
more
+ * than one zstd frame.
Can it?
If not, we must require it in the specification.
Actually, now that you mention it, it would make sense anyway to
29.04.2020 15:17, Max Reitz wrote:
On 29.04.20 12:37, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
29.04.2020 13:24, Max Reitz wrote:
On 28.04.20 22:00, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of
On 29.04.20 12:38, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 29.04.2020 13:24, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 28.04.20 22:00, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>>> zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
>>> It provides better compression performance maintaining
>>> the same level of the compression ratio in
On 29.04.20 12:37, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 29.04.2020 13:24, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 28.04.20 22:00, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>>> zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
>>> It provides better compression performance maintaining
>>> the same level of the compression ratio
On 29.04.2020 13:24, Max Reitz wrote:
On 28.04.20 22:00, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of the compression ratio in comparison with
zlib, which, at the moment, is the only
29.04.2020 13:24, Max Reitz wrote:
On 28.04.20 22:00, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of the compression ratio in comparison with
zlib, which, at the moment, is the only compression
On 28.04.20 22:00, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
> It provides better compression performance maintaining
> the same level of the compression ratio in comparison with
> zlib, which, at the moment, is the only compression
> method available.
>
> The
On 4/28/20 3:00 PM, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
zstd significantly reduces cluster compression time.
It provides better compression performance maintaining
the same level of the compression ratio in comparison with
zlib, which, at the moment, is the only compression
method available.
The performance
13 matches
Mail list logo