Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 1/30/23 11:06, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> It was only used for RAM, and in that case, it means that this amount
>> of data was sent for memory. Just delete the field in all callers.
>
> Could you describe, why it's safe to change the behavior for RAM?
I
On 1/30/23 11:06, Juan Quintela wrote:
It was only used for RAM, and in that case, it means that this amount
of data was sent for memory. Just delete the field in all callers.
Could you describe, why it's safe to change the behavior for RAM?
Also, I think it would be a lot better to split
