Joelle van Dyne writes:
> Sorry, are you asking for a review from me? I don’t know if I’m
> qualified to review the other patches but I did review the iOS patch.
Anyone can review code and given you wrote the original patches you
certainly know enough about the flow to give some opinion. If
Sorry, are you asking for a review from me? I don’t know if I’m
qualified to review the other patches but I did review the iOS patch.
-j
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:20 AM Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 11/16/20 7:47 PM, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
> > Hi, I'm wondering what the progress is for this
On 11/16/20 7:47 PM, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
> Hi, I'm wondering what the progress is for this patch set and the iOS
> support one? I know 5.2 is frozen, so will this be considered for 6.0?
> Apple Silicon Macs are out now and a few people are asking about QEMU
> support :)
Yes, this will be
Hi, I'm wondering what the progress is for this patch set and the iOS
support one? I know 5.2 is frozen, so will this be considered for 6.0?
Apple Silicon Macs are out now and a few people are asking about QEMU
support :)
-j
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 9:29 PM Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> This is my
LGTM, tested and working on iOS.
-j
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 7:29 PM Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> This is my take on Joelle's patch set:
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-10/msg07837.html
>
> Changes for v3:
> * Even more patches -- all tcg backends converted.
> * Fixups
Patchew URL:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20201106032921.600200-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org/
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 20201106032921.600200-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 00/41]