On 02/01/2023 17.47, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
Am 2. Januar 2023 16:09:08 UTC schrieb Thomas Huth :
On 02/01/2023 14.36, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 31/12/2022 00.45, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
Am 29. Dezember 2022 10:58:48 UTC schrieb Thomas Huth :
[...]
static uint32_t
Am 2. Januar 2023 16:09:08 UTC schrieb Thomas Huth :
>On 02/01/2023 14.36, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 31/12/2022 00.45, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 29. Dezember 2022 10:58:48 UTC schrieb Thomas Huth :
>[...]
static uint32_t rtc_periodic_clock_ticks(RTCState *s)
{
@@ -922,14
On 02/01/2023 14.36, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 31/12/2022 00.45, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
Am 29. Dezember 2022 10:58:48 UTC schrieb Thomas Huth :
[...]
static uint32_t rtc_periodic_clock_ticks(RTCState *s)
{
@@ -922,14 +911,15 @@ static void rtc_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error
**errp)
On 31/12/2022 00.45, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
Am 29. Dezember 2022 10:58:48 UTC schrieb Thomas Huth :
The only reason for this code being target dependent is the apic-related
code in rtc_policy_slew_deliver_irq(). Since these apic functions are rather
simple, we can easily move them into a
Am 29. Dezember 2022 10:58:48 UTC schrieb Thomas Huth :
>The only reason for this code being target dependent is the apic-related
>code in rtc_policy_slew_deliver_irq(). Since these apic functions are rather
>simple, we can easily move them into a new, separate file (apic_irqcount.c)
>which
