On 4/17/21 6:52 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
On 4/16/21 8:44 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
It will be an eventual thing, though: I think we need to agree on a
style guide document and in that same series, fix up the instances of
defying that guide. I
John Snow writes:
> On 4/16/21 8:44 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> PEP8's BDFL writes: "For flowing long blocks of text with fewer
>>> structural restrictions (docstrings or comments), the line length should
>>> be limited to 72 characters."
>>>
>>> I do not like this
On 4/16/21 8:44 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
PEP8's BDFL writes: "For flowing long blocks of text with fewer
structural restrictions (docstrings or comments), the line length should
be limited to 72 characters."
I do not like this patch. I have included it explicitly to
John Snow writes:
> PEP8's BDFL writes: "For flowing long blocks of text with fewer
> structural restrictions (docstrings or comments), the line length should
> be limited to 72 characters."
>
> I do not like this patch. I have included it explicitly to recommend we
> do not pay any further heed
On 4/9/21 5:33 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 04:44:25PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 16:33, John Snow wrote:
Being less terse about it: Mostly, I don't like how it enforces this
column width even for indented
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 04:44:25PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 16:33, John Snow wrote:
>> > Being less terse about it: Mostly, I don't like how it enforces this
>> > column width even for indented structures. Generally, we claim that 72
>>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 04:44:25PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 16:33, John Snow wrote:
> > Being less terse about it: Mostly, I don't like how it enforces this
> > column width even for indented structures. Generally, we claim that 72
> > columns is "comfortable to read"
John Snow writes:
> On 3/26/21 2:26 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> On 3/25/21 11:21 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
> PEP8's BDFL writes: "For flowing long blocks of text with fewer
> structural restrictions (docstrings or comments),
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 16:33, John Snow wrote:
>> Being less terse about it: Mostly, I don't like how it enforces this
>> column width even for indented structures. Generally, we claim that 72
>> columns is "comfortable to read" and I agree.
>>
>>
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 16:33, John Snow wrote:
> Being less terse about it: Mostly, I don't like how it enforces this
> column width even for indented structures. Generally, we claim that 72
> columns is "comfortable to read" and I agree.
>
> However, when we
On 3/26/21 2:26 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
On 3/25/21 11:21 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
PEP8's BDFL writes: "For flowing long blocks of text with fewer
structural restrictions (docstrings or comments), the line length should
be limited to 72
John Snow writes:
> On 3/25/21 11:21 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> PEP8's BDFL writes: "For flowing long blocks of text with fewer
>>> structural restrictions (docstrings or comments), the line length should
>>> be limited to 72 characters."
>>>
>>> I do not like
On 3/25/21 11:21 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
PEP8's BDFL writes: "For flowing long blocks of text with fewer
structural restrictions (docstrings or comments), the line length should
be limited to 72 characters."
I do not like this patch. I have included it explicitly to
John Snow writes:
> PEP8's BDFL writes: "For flowing long blocks of text with fewer
> structural restrictions (docstrings or comments), the line length should
> be limited to 72 characters."
>
> I do not like this patch. I have included it explicitly to recommend we
> do not pay any further heed
14 matches
Mail list logo
