On 2024/04/08 17:06, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:57 AM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2024/04/08 16:54, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:42 AM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2024/04/08 16:40, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:30 AM Akihiko Odaki
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:57 AM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
>
> On 2024/04/08 16:54, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:42 AM Akihiko Odaki
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2024/04/08 16:40, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:30 AM Akihiko Odaki
> >>> wrote:
>
>
On 2024/04/08 16:54, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:42 AM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2024/04/08 16:40, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:30 AM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2024/04/08 7:09, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:12 PM Akihiko Odaki
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:42 AM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
>
> On 2024/04/08 16:40, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:30 AM Akihiko Odaki
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2024/04/08 7:09, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:12 PM Akihiko Odaki
> >>> wrote:
>
>
On 2024/04/08 16:40, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:30 AM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2024/04/08 7:09, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:12 PM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
The peer buffer is qualified with const and not meant to be modified.
IMHO, this buffer is not
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:30 AM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
>
> On 2024/04/08 7:09, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:12 PM Akihiko Odaki
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The peer buffer is qualified with const and not meant to be modified.
> >
> > IMHO, this buffer is not so 'const' (although
On 2024/04/08 7:09, Yuri Benditovich wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:12 PM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
The peer buffer is qualified with const and not meant to be modified.
IMHO, this buffer is not so 'const' (although the prototype states so),
it is allocated in net.c
btw, another procedure in
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:12 PM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
>
> The peer buffer is qualified with const and not meant to be modified.
IMHO, this buffer is not so 'const' (although the prototype states so),
it is allocated in net.c
btw, another procedure in this file also modifies the buffer