On 05/24/2012 10:58 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/24/2012 05:11 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
Not in breakpoint_invalidate as the missing offset was compensated
before your commit (well, starting with c2f07f81a2 in fact).
I'd say
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/24/2012 10:58 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/24/2012 05:11 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
Not in breakpoint_invalidate as the missing offset was compensated
On 05/28/2012 02:54 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
Right. If the fix is going to be checked in then TeLeMan's original version
with '|' is preferable for this reason.
I disagree. Whatever we call cpu_get_phys_page_debug() has to either
mask out the low bits, or not (I prefer the latter, since it's
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
tb_invalidate_phys_addr has to called with the exact physical address of
the breakpoint we add/remove, not just the page's base address.
Otherwise we easily fail to flush the right TB.
On 2012-05-24 07:51, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
tb_invalidate_phys_addr has to called with the exact physical address of
the breakpoint we add/remove, not just the page's base address.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 07:51, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
tb_invalidate_phys_addr has to called with the exact physical address
On 2012-05-24 09:08, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 07:51, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
tb_invalidate_phys_addr has
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 09:08, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 07:51, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de
On 2012-05-24 09:42, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 09:08, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 07:51, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 09:42, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 09:08, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Jan Kiszka
On 2012-05-24 11:11, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 09:42, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 09:08, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012
On 05/24/2012 05:11 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
Not in breakpoint_invalidate as the missing offset was compensated
before your commit (well, starting with c2f07f81a2 in fact).
I'd say that compensation that you mention
ram_addr = (memory_region_get_ram_addr(section.mr)
+
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 11:11, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 09:42, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Jan Kiszka
On 2012-05-24 11:29, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 11:11, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
On 2012-05-24 09:42, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/24/2012 05:11 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
Not in breakpoint_invalidate as the missing offset was compensated
before your commit (well, starting with c2f07f81a2 in fact).
I'd say that compensation that you mention
On 2012-05-23 23:34, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
tb_invalidate_phys_addr has to called with the exact physical address of
the breakpoint we add/remove, not just the page's base address.
Otherwise we easily fail to flush the right TB.
Regression of 1e7855a558.
16 matches
Mail list logo
