On 24/11/2017 11:07, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 November 2017 at 22:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 22/11/2017 13:14, Peter Maydell wrote:
We do this all of the time for more regular tests that are obviously
compile-time. I am a really big fan of this, because it
On 23 November 2017 at 22:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 22/11/2017 13:14, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> We do this all of the time for more regular tests that are obviously
>>> compile-time. I am a really big fan of this, because it makes sure that the
>>> (usually 32-bit) else
On 22/11/2017 13:14, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> We do this all of the time for more regular tests that are obviously
>> compile-time. I am a really big fan of this, because it makes sure that the
>> (usually 32-bit) else branch continues to compile.
> I'm happy with code that is "we assume the
On 22 November 2017 at 08:41, Juan Quintela wrote:
> This commit started use tb_unlock() and tlb_set_dirty() on non TCG
> code. Add the function as stubs.
>
> commit 27266271977c5a30f2f7d493e042be1897827bdd
> Author: Peter Maydell
> Date: Mon Nov
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:32:04 -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 11/22/2017 05:41 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > This commit started use tb_unlock() and tlb_set_dirty() on non TCG
> > code. Add the function as stubs.
> >
> > commit 27266271977c5a30f2f7d493e042be1897827bdd
> > Author:
On 11/22/2017 05:41 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> This commit started use tb_unlock() and tlb_set_dirty() on non TCG
> code. Add the function as stubs.
>
> commit 27266271977c5a30f2f7d493e042be1897827bdd
> Author: Peter Maydell
> Date: Mon Nov 20 18:08:27 2017 +
>
* Richard Henderson (richard.hender...@linaro.org) wrote:
> On 11/22/2017 01:03 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 22 November 2017 at 12:01, Richard Henderson
> > wrote:
> >> On 11/22/2017 09:41 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >>> This commit started use tb_unlock() and
On 22 November 2017 at 12:08, Richard Henderson
wrote:
> On 11/22/2017 01:03 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Wow, I totally do not expect "assert(tcg_enabled())" to mean
>> "we rely on the compiler to be able to determine that this
>> code is dead" (and in general I'm
On 11/22/2017 01:03 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 November 2017 at 12:01, Richard Henderson
> wrote:
>> On 11/22/2017 09:41 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>> This commit started use tb_unlock() and tlb_set_dirty() on non TCG
>>> code. Add the function as stubs.
>>>
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 November 2017 at 08:41, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> This commit started use tb_unlock() and tlb_set_dirty() on non TCG
>> code. Add the function as stubs.
>>
>> commit 27266271977c5a30f2f7d493e042be1897827bdd
>> Author:
On 22 November 2017 at 12:01, Richard Henderson
wrote:
> On 11/22/2017 09:41 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> This commit started use tb_unlock() and tlb_set_dirty() on non TCG
>> code. Add the function as stubs.
>>
>> commit 27266271977c5a30f2f7d493e042be1897827bdd
>>
On 22 November 2017 at 08:41, Juan Quintela wrote:
> This commit started use tb_unlock() and tlb_set_dirty() on non TCG
> code. Add the function as stubs.
>
> commit 27266271977c5a30f2f7d493e042be1897827bdd
> Author: Peter Maydell
> Date: Mon Nov
On 11/22/2017 09:41 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> This commit started use tb_unlock() and tlb_set_dirty() on non TCG
> code. Add the function as stubs.
>
> commit 27266271977c5a30f2f7d493e042be1897827bdd
> Author: Peter Maydell
> Date: Mon Nov 20 18:08:27 2017 +
>
13 matches
Mail list logo