On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:25:12PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 12:01 -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:43:02PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > The proposal doesn't directly address the interaction between virtio
> > > protocol version and
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:25:12PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 12:01 -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:43:02PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > The proposal doesn't directly address the interaction between virtio
> > > protocol version and
On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 12:01 -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:43:02PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > The proposal doesn't directly address the interaction between virtio
> > protocol version and slot type. [...]
>
> It does. See the interface names added to each
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:06:31AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:01:37PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
[...]
> > I'm considering doing this in v2:
> >
> > * Remove the -0.9 device type, because nobody seems to need it
> > * Add two device types:
> > *
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:10:04PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:22:37AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > This patch adds separate device types for each of those virtio
> > > device flavors:
> > >
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:22:37AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > This patch adds separate device types for each of those virtio
> > device flavors:
> >
> > - virtio-*-pci: the existing multi-purpose device types
> > -
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:01:37PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:43:02PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 15:12 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> > > On 10/16/2018 01:02 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 03:14:04PM -0300,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:43:02PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 15:12 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> > On 10/16/2018 01:02 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 03:14:04PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > How about using only the major digit in the
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 15:12 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 10/16/2018 01:02 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 03:14:04PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > How about using only the major digit in the device names eg
> >
> > 'virtio-blk-0.x'
> > 'virtio-blk-1.x'
> >
> >
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> This patch adds separate device types for each of those virtio
> device flavors:
>
> - virtio-*-pci: the existing multi-purpose device types
> - Configurable using `disable-legacy` and `disable-modern`
> properties
> -
On 10/16/2018 01:02 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 03:14:04PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 05:35:12PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
The current virtio-*-pci device
Hi,
> > See above. We can't drop disable-modern.
>
> Good point. But this doesn't require it to be a supported device
> option for users/management. Maybe we should rename it to
> "x-disable-modern" (but that's a separate discussion).
I think it would be more useful to allow properties
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 03:14:04PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 05:35:12PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > The current virtio-*-pci device types actually represent 3
> > > different types of
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 10:32:20 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:39:30AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > So, what I'd propose is:
> > - virtio-*-pci-standard: compliant with the virtio standard 1.0 or
> > later; no legacy fallback
> > - virtio-*-pci-transitional:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 08:48:16AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I don't know. The `disable-modern` option already exists but I
> > don't know who would want to use it.
>
> Compat property for old (2.6 & older) machine types.
>
> > > Right - maybe a flag to disable modern interface
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:39:30AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:14:04 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 05:35:12PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > > The current
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:14:04 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 05:35:12PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > The current virtio-*-pci device types actually represent 3
> > > different types of
Hi,
> I don't know. The `disable-modern` option already exists but I
> don't know who would want to use it.
Compat property for old (2.6 & older) machine types.
> > Right - maybe a flag to disable modern interface is enough.
> > We thus get two types:
> > - transitional (legacy)
> > -
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:45:56AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 23:54:35 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > The current virtio-*-pci device types actually represent 3
> > different types of devices:
> > * virtio 1.0 non-transitional devices
> > * virtio 1.0 transitional
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 06:27:21AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:16:41AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > The current virtio-*-pci device types actually represent 3
> > > different types of
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 05:35:12PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > The current virtio-*-pci device types actually represent 3
> > different types of devices:
> > * virtio 1.0 non-transitional devices
> > * virtio 1.0
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:16:41AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > The current virtio-*-pci device types actually represent 3
> > different types of devices:
> > * virtio 1.0 non-transitional devices
> > * virtio 1.0 transitional
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 23:54:35 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> The current virtio-*-pci device types actually represent 3
> different types of devices:
> * virtio 1.0 non-transitional devices
> * virtio 1.0 transitional devices
> * virtio 0.9 ("legacy device" in virtio 1.0 terminology)
>
> That
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> The current virtio-*-pci device types actually represent 3
> different types of devices:
> * virtio 1.0 non-transitional devices
> * virtio 1.0 transitional devices
Ok.
> * virtio 0.9 ("legacy device" in virtio 1.0 terminology)
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:54:35PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> The current virtio-*-pci device types actually represent 3
> different types of devices:
> * virtio 1.0 non-transitional devices
> * virtio 1.0 transitional devices
> * virtio 0.9 ("legacy device" in virtio 1.0 terminology)
>
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
