On 2018-09-25 18:52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 25/09/2018 17:20, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The uint16_t member cu_type of struct SenseId is not naturally aligned,
>> and since the struct is marked with QEMU_PACKED, this can lead to
>> unaligned memory accesses - which does not work on
On 25/09/2018 17:20, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The uint16_t member cu_type of struct SenseId is not naturally aligned,
> and since the struct is marked with QEMU_PACKED, this can lead to
> unaligned memory accesses - which does not work on architectures like
> Sparc. Thus remove the QEMU_PACKED here
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 18:43:22 +0200
Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2018-09-25 18:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:20:08 +0200
> > Thomas Huth wrote:
> >
> >> The uint16_t member cu_type of struct SenseId is not naturally aligned,
> >> and since the struct is marked with
On 2018-09-25 18:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:20:08 +0200
> Thomas Huth wrote:
>
>> The uint16_t member cu_type of struct SenseId is not naturally aligned,
>> and since the struct is marked with QEMU_PACKED, this can lead to
>> unaligned memory accesses - which does not work
On 25 September 2018 at 17:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:20:08 +0200
> Thomas Huth wrote:
>
>> The uint16_t member cu_type of struct SenseId is not naturally aligned,
>> and since the struct is marked with QEMU_PACKED, this can lead to
>> unaligned memory accesses - which
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:20:08 +0200
Thomas Huth wrote:
> The uint16_t member cu_type of struct SenseId is not naturally aligned,
> and since the struct is marked with QEMU_PACKED, this can lead to
> unaligned memory accesses - which does not work on architectures like
> Sparc. Thus remove the
