On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 7:55 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 26-07-17 19:44:23, Wei Wang wrote:
> [...]
> > I thought about it more. Probably we can use the callback function
> > with a little change like this:
> >
> > void walk_free_mem(void *opaque1, void (*visit)(void *opaque2,
> > unsigned
On Wed 26-07-17 19:44:23, Wei Wang wrote:
[...]
> I thought about it more. Probably we can use the callback function with a
> little change like this:
>
> void walk_free_mem(void *opaque1, void (*visit)(void *opaque2, unsigned long
> pfn,
>unsigned long nr_pages))
> {
> ...
> f
On 07/26/2017 06:24 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 26-07-17 10:22:23, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/25/2017 10:53 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 25-07-17 14:47:16, Wang, Wei W wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:42 PM, hal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 25-07-17 19:56:24, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM,
On Wed 26-07-17 10:22:23, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 07/25/2017 10:53 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Tue 25-07-17 14:47:16, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> >>On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:42 PM, hal Hocko wrote:
> >>>On Tue 25-07-17 19:56:24, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On
On 07/25/2017 10:53 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 25-07-17 14:47:16, Wang, Wei W wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:42 PM, hal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 25-07-17 19:56:24, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM,
On Tue 25-07-17 14:47:16, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:42 PM, hal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 25-07-17 19:56:24, Wei Wang wrote:
> > > On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > >On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
> > > >>On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:42 PM, hal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 25-07-17 19:56:24, Wei Wang wrote:
> > On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
> > >>On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >>>On Wed 19-07-17 20:01:18, Wei Wang wrote:
> > O
On Tue 25-07-17 19:56:24, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
> >>On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>>On Wed 19-07-17 20:01:18, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>>[...
> >All
On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 19-07-17 20:01:18, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/19/2017 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...
All you should need is the check for the page reference count, no? I
a
On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Wed 19-07-17 20:01:18, Wei Wang wrote:
> >>On 07/19/2017 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >[...
> >>>All you should need is the check for the page reference count, no? I
> >>>assume you do some sort of pfn
On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 19-07-17 20:01:18, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/19/2017 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...
All you should need is the check for the page reference count, no? I
assume you do some sort of pfn walk and so you should be able to get an
access to the str
On Wed 19-07-17 20:01:18, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...
> >All you should need is the check for the page reference count, no? I
> >assume you do some sort of pfn walk and so you should be able to get an
> >access to the struct page.
>
> Not necessarily - the g
On 07/19/2017 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 18-07-17 10:12:14, Wei Wang wrote:
[...]
Probably I should have included the introduction of the usages in
the log. Hope it is not too later to explain here:
Yes this should have been described in the cover.
OK, I will do it in the next vers
On Tue 18-07-17 10:12:14, Wei Wang wrote:
[...]
> Probably I should have included the introduction of the usages in
> the log. Hope it is not too later to explain here:
Yes this should have been described in the cover.
> Live migration needs to transfer the VM's memory from the source
> machine
On 07/17/2017 11:24 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 14-07-17 22:17:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:30:23PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 12-07-17 20:40:19, Wei Wang wrote:
This patch adds support for reporting blocks of pages on the free list
specified by the caller
On Fri 14-07-17 22:17:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:30:23PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 12-07-17 20:40:19, Wei Wang wrote:
> > > This patch adds support for reporting blocks of pages on the free list
> > > specified by the caller.
> > >
> > > As pages can lea
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:30:23PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 12-07-17 20:40:19, Wei Wang wrote:
> > This patch adds support for reporting blocks of pages on the free list
> > specified by the caller.
> >
> > As pages can leave the free list during this call or immediately
> > afterwards,
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:54:30PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 14-07-17 14:30:23, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 12-07-17 20:40:19, Wei Wang wrote:
> > > This patch adds support for reporting blocks of pages on the free list
> > > specified by the caller.
> > >
> > > As pages can leave the
On Fri 14-07-17 14:30:23, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 12-07-17 20:40:19, Wei Wang wrote:
> > This patch adds support for reporting blocks of pages on the free list
> > specified by the caller.
> >
> > As pages can leave the free list during this call or immediately
> > afterwards, they are not gu
On Wed 12-07-17 20:40:19, Wei Wang wrote:
> This patch adds support for reporting blocks of pages on the free list
> specified by the caller.
>
> As pages can leave the free list during this call or immediately
> afterwards, they are not guaranteed to be free after the function
> returns. The only
On 07/13/2017 08:33 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 08:40:19PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
This patch adds support for reporting blocks of pages on the free list
specified by the caller.
As pages can leave the free list during this call or immediately
afterwards, they are not g
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 08:40:19PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> This patch adds support for reporting blocks of pages on the free list
> specified by the caller.
>
> As pages can leave the free list during this call or immediately
> afterwards, they are not guaranteed to be free after the function
> r
22 matches
Mail list logo
