On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 07:57:34PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * David Gibson (da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au) wrote:
>
>
>
> > So. AFAICT the estimate of page dirty rate is based on the assumption
> > that page dirties are independent of each other - one page is as
> > likely to be
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 12:42:49AM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 09:48:17PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:14:52AM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > > * Balamuruhan S
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:28:04AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * David Gibson (da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au) wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:24:04PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Balamuruhan S (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 09:48:17PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:14:52AM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Balamuruhan S (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at
* David Gibson (da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au) wrote:
> So. AFAICT the estimate of page dirty rate is based on the assumption
> that page dirties are independent of each other - one page is as
> likely to be dirtied as any other. If we don't make that assumption,
> I don't see how we can really
* David Gibson (da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:24:04PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Balamuruhan S (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > > * Balamuruhan S
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:24:04PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Balamuruhan S (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > * Balamuruhan S (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:14:52AM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Balamuruhan S (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:57:26AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at
* Balamuruhan S (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Balamuruhan S (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:57:26AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:55:50AM +1000,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Balamuruhan S (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:57:26AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:55:50AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at
* Balamuruhan S (bal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:57:26AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:55:50AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 06:53:17PM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> > > > expected_downtime value is not accurate
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:55:50AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 06:53:17PM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> > expected_downtime value is not accurate with dirty_pages_rate * page_size,
> > using ram_bytes_remaining would yeild it correct.
>
> This commit message hasn't been
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:57:26AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:55:50AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 06:53:17PM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> > > expected_downtime value is not accurate with dirty_pages_rate * page_size,
> > > using
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:55:50AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 06:53:17PM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> > expected_downtime value is not accurate with dirty_pages_rate * page_size,
> > using ram_bytes_remaining would yeild it correct.
>
> This commit message hasn't been
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 06:53:17PM +0530, Balamuruhan S wrote:
> expected_downtime value is not accurate with dirty_pages_rate * page_size,
> using ram_bytes_remaining would yeild it correct.
This commit message hasn't been changed since v1, but the patch is
doing something completely different.
15 matches
Mail list logo