On 08/06/2017 13:05, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>> Weird. Doesn't QEMU wait for response to GET_VRING_BASE? I think
>> it does since we migrate the returned value.
>
> It does and that's what I said on my first message. On
> GET_VRING_BASE, a vhost-user-scsi backend application will stop
> picking
> On 8 Jun 2017, at 01:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:56:57PM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
This could be documented,
>>>
>>> It is documented AFAIK. Pls take a look at the spec documentation.
>>
>> Found it now. It's not under
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:56:57PM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > > This could be documented,
> >
> > It is documented AFAIK. Pls take a look at the spec documentation.
>
> Found it now. It's not under GET_VRING_BASE, it's under "starting
> and stopping rings"---fair enough.
>
> In the
> > This could be documented,
>
> It is documented AFAIK. Pls take a look at the spec documentation.
Found it now. It's not under GET_VRING_BASE, it's under "starting
and stopping rings"---fair enough.
In the case of vhost-user-scsi, however, QEMU also must not proceed
until vhost-user-scsi
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:22:24PM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > How, since there is no synchronization point between the vhost-user
> > > server on the source and the destination?
> >
> > The idea is that the backend should both stop picking up new requests and
> > also quiesce outstanding
> On 7 Jun 2017, at 16:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On 7 June 2017 at 16:39, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 Jun 2017, at 16:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7 June 2017 at 16:28, Paolo Bonzini
> > How, since there is no synchronization point between the vhost-user
> > server on the source and the destination?
>
> The idea is that the backend should both stop picking up new requests and
> also quiesce outstanding requests upon a GET_VRING_BASE vhost message.
This could be documented,
> On 7 Jun 2017, at 17:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>
> On 07/06/2017 17:39, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 Jun 2017, at 16:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7 June 2017 at 16:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
From:
On 07/06/2017 17:39, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
>> On 7 Jun 2017, at 16:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> On 7 June 2017 at 16:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> From: Felipe Franciosi
>>>
>>> This commit introduces a vhost-user device
On 7 June 2017 at 16:39, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
>
>> On 7 Jun 2017, at 16:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>> On 7 June 2017 at 16:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> From: Felipe Franciosi
>>>
>>> This commit
> On 7 Jun 2017, at 16:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On 7 June 2017 at 16:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> From: Felipe Franciosi
>>
>> This commit introduces a vhost-user device for SCSI. This is based
>> on the existing
On 7 June 2017 at 16:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Felipe Franciosi
>
> This commit introduces a vhost-user device for SCSI. This is based
> on the existing vhost-scsi implementation, but done over vhost-user
> instead. It also uses a chardev to
12 matches
Mail list logo