On 15/09/2016 16:13, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> 1) something like this
>
> diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c
> index a9d8aef..6322265 100644
> --- a/target-i386/helper.c
> +++ b/target-i386/helper.c
> @@ -1379,13 +1379,22 @@ void x86_cpu_exec_exit(CPUState *cs)
> }
>
>
Hi Paolo,
typedef struct {
@@ -3568,6 +3578,7 @@ int cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong addr,
int l;
hwaddr phys_addr;
target_ulong page;
+int mode = is_write ? WRITE_DATA : READ_DATA;
while (len > 0) {
int asidx;
@@ -3583,14 +3594,9 @@ int
So looking at code, i have impression that write will go through the
cpu_physical_memory_write_rom but the read will still go through
address_space_rw which will eventually invoke address_space_read.
Yes, you'd have to modify it a bit. Something like
Sure this will works, thanks for the
On 15/09/2016 00:06, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>
> here is what I see:
>
> int cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong addr,
> uint8_t *buf, int len, int is_write)
> {
>
>
>if (is_write)
>cpu_physical_memory_write_rom_internal()
> else
On 09/14/2016 04:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 14/09/2016 23:47, Brijesh Singh wrote:
On 09/14/2016 04:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 14/09/2016 22:59, Brijesh Singh wrote:
I will look into hooking up the callback into ROM read/write ops. I was
thinking about adding a new argument in
On 14/09/2016 23:47, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>
>
> On 09/14/2016 04:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14/09/2016 22:59, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>> I will look into hooking up the callback into ROM read/write ops. I was
>>> thinking about adding a new argument in
>>>
On 09/14/2016 04:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 14/09/2016 22:59, Brijesh Singh wrote:
I will look into hooking up the callback into ROM read/write ops. I was
thinking about adding a new argument in
cpu_physical_memory_write_rom_internal()
void cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(AddressSpace
On 14/09/2016 22:59, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> I will look into hooking up the callback into ROM read/write ops. I was
> thinking about adding a new argument in
> cpu_physical_memory_write_rom_internal()
>
> void cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(AddressSpace *as, hwaddr addr,
>
Hi Paolo,
On 09/13/2016 06:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 13/09/2016 16:49, Brijesh Singh wrote:
+/* Register SEV read/write ops for the guest RAM */
+if (kvm_sev_enabled())
+memory_region_set_ram_ops(ram, kvm_sev_get_ram_ops());
If you don't actually need this one except
On 13/09/2016 16:49, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>
> +/* Register SEV read/write ops for the guest RAM */
> +if (kvm_sev_enabled())
> +memory_region_set_ram_ops(ram, kvm_sev_get_ram_ops());
If you don't actually need this one except for -kernel it would be very
nice, because then the
10 matches
Mail list logo
