On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:55:25AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 07/02/2014 11:16, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
You are not alone. I remember we spent lots of time trying to convince
Anthony to allow global properties and compat_props affect dynamic
properties not just static properties, and
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 07/02/2014 11:16, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
You are not alone. I remember we spent lots of time trying to convince
Anthony to allow global properties and compat_props affect dynamic
properties not just static
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:31:35AM -0800, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 07/02/2014 11:16, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
You are not alone. I remember we spent lots of time trying to convince
Anthony to allow global
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:31:35AM -0800, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 07/02/2014 11:16, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
You are not alone. I
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:58:30AM -0800, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:31:35AM -0800, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il
Il 11/02/2014 17:43, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
But compat properties as a concept could be made to work with dynamic
properties. They would have to be evaluated after instance init.
There's quite a few places they would end up touching I suspect.
They already work.
But if they work by
Am 11.02.2014 16:58, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:31:35AM -0800, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 07/02/2014 11:16, Eduardo
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 11.02.2014 16:58, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:31:35AM -0800, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:55 AM,
Il 11/02/2014 19:57, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
Erm, sorry, that is already implemented in qemu.git!? instance_post_init
by Eduardo plus glue by me.
Ah, even better then :-)
Still, the code is a bit ad hoc. Static properties would let us remove
that code and just read dc-props arrays
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 05:57:38PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
[...]
And it's true that we could in fact just instantiate the object for
-device foo,? - it's just that nobody wrote code for that. I didn't do
the original QOM conversion so I don't feel guilty, I don't normally use
-device
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 05:57:38PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
[...]
If there's no relation between a CPU model named, e.g., Haswell and
the one on an Intel Haswell chip any more, then we should give them
artificial names like qemu64; I strongly believe that Haswell
definition in code
Il 07/02/2014 11:16, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
You are not alone. I remember we spent lots of time trying to convince
Anthony to allow global properties and compat_props affect dynamic
properties not just static properties, and static properties were a big
deal due to reasons I didn't
Am 06.02.2014 17:16, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
(CCing libvir-list again, as this is continuing a discussion about a
subject that interests libvirt developers, from another thread.)
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 04:51:17PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 06.02.2014 16:19, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
On
13 matches
Mail list logo
