Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 6 April 2017 at 19:36, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 6 April 2017 at 19:15, Rainer Müller wrote: >> A bit late to this thread, but the original problem was also reported >> for Mac OS X with --enable-curses in MacPorts. The build fails with the >>

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 6 April 2017 at 19:15, Rainer Müller wrote: > A bit late to this thread, but the original problem was also reported > for Mac OS X with --enable-curses in MacPorts. The build fails with the > same symptoms as in the original report. > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 2017-02-17 17:57, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 17 February 2017 at 11:20, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 17/02/2017 11:18, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> Defining _XOPEN_SOURCE is easy enough, and I think we should >>> do it unconditionally. We should check what effect this has

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 21 February 2017 at 09:41, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Eric Blake writes: > > [...] >> 'git send-email -s' can also add Signed-off-by: lines, if you didn't add >> them earlier (but only if you use send-email, rather than attachments) :) > > That's fine, as

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

Eric Blake writes: [...] > 'git send-email -s' can also add Signed-off-by: lines, if you didn't add > them earlier (but only if you use send-email, rather than attachments) :) That's fine, as you *should* use git send-email. If it looks unattractive to you because it needs

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 02/19/2017 01:02 AM, Chad Joan wrote: > development work. There are no user accounts, just root. I have tried to > avoid putting any personal information on it. If I am on it, then I'm > editing files in /etc or installing system-wide software. I'm realizing > that I might have to change

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 02/17/2017 11:15 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > The kernel docs have a longer list of mail clients with > notes about suitability: > https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/email-clients.html > but the set of "just works" clients is very small. Currently fails with 403 Forbidden You don't have

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 19 February 2017 at 07:22, Chad Joan wrote: > I suspect I'm going to encounter this problem again as I try to make small > fixes for more projects, so it might be worth it for me to spend a small > amount of time at some point setting up a mail client that I can send git >

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

This is kinda depressing to read :( But thanks for explaining. I got a good laugh when it mentioned of Lotus Notes, "Run away from it." Would it be reasonable to stick a link to that article in the submit a patch document? Something like, "If you can't use 'git send-email' for any reason, then

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/17/2017 10:54 AM, Chad Joan wrote: > > Wow, that is some quick turn-around. Well done! > > > > My thoughts: > > > >- I find this summary info very helpful! On behalf of the N people > >trying to heal paper

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 02/17/2017 10:34 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 02/17/2017 03:28 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 17 February 2017 at 06:43, Fam Zheng wrote: >>> But your point is taken, we should make the first (or a one-shot) >>> contribution as easy as possible. >> >> Yes; we could do with

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 17 February 2017 at 16:54, Chad Joan wrote: > so if we can test and > approve even /some/ of the more popular mail clients (ex: gmail, > thunderbird, outlook, etc) for use, it would help newbies A LOT. Pretty sure we've seen mangled emails from all of those. The problem is

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

How wonderful! Problem solved. Now I think that just having an example could kill the misconception forever ;) On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 17/02/2017 17:54, Chad Joan wrote: > > Regarding the signature: IIRC, setting up certificates on

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 17 February 2017 at 11:20, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 17/02/2017 11:18, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Defining _XOPEN_SOURCE is easy enough, and I think we should >> do it unconditionally. We should check what effect this has >> on the BSD hosts though I guess. (You could

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 17/02/2017 17:54, Chad Joan wrote: > Regarding the signature: IIRC, setting up certificates on a machine > using gpg can be quite time consuming and learning-intensive if you've > never needed to do it before. Having that example will go a long way to > help with this. There is still a

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

Wow, that is some quick turn-around. Well done! My thoughts: - I find this summary info very helpful! On behalf of the N people trying to heal paper cuts: thank you! - I still recommend an example snippet for shell/bash interaction that demonstrates the workflow you expect from a

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 02/17/2017 03:28 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 17 February 2017 at 06:43, Fam Zheng wrote: >> But your point is taken, we should make the first (or a one-shot) >> contribution as easy as possible. > > Yes; we could do with providing a "This page seems very long..." >

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

Sure. I'll see your -O2 and raise you a -c ;) It went like this: $ gcc -c first.c -O2 $ gcc -c second.c -O2 $ gcc -c third.c -O2 No complaints from gcc whatsoever (unless I drop the -c, then ld complains about the undefined reference to main, which I think we all expect). Just incase you

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 17/02/2017 11:18, Peter Maydell wrote: > Defining _XOPEN_SOURCE is easy enough, and I think we should > do it unconditionally. We should check what effect this has > on the BSD hosts though I guess. (You could argue that we > should be defining _XOPEN_SOURCE anyway for the benefit of > the

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 17/02/2017 10:17, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Of course, *if* that other C library, and the Curses implementation, > claim compatibility with glibc as far as _GNU_SOURCE goes, *then* I > fully agree with you. (IOW, it depends on the condition that you > formulated above, "if musl wants to support

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 17 February 2017 at 08:56, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > So I do think that if musl wants to support _GNU_SOURCE, it should also > auto-define; > however it doesn't, see > https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/include/features.h. Yes, I agree that this looks like a musl

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On Fri, 02/17 10:23, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 02/17/17 07:43, Fam Zheng wrote: > > On Thu, 02/16 12:47, Chad Joan wrote: > >> I am glad others are chiming in and might provide better solutions. > >> > >> Honestly, following the instructions at > >>

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 02/17/17 07:43, Fam Zheng wrote: > On Thu, 02/16 12:47, Chad Joan wrote: >> I am glad others are chiming in and might provide better solutions. >> >> Honestly, following the instructions at >> http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch to-the-letter is quite >> daunting to me, just to

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 17 February 2017 at 06:43, Fam Zheng wrote: > But your point is taken, we should make the first (or a one-shot) > contribution as easy as possible. Yes; we could do with providing a "This page seems very long..." introduction section. The absolute bare minimum requirements

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 02/17/17 09:56, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 16/02/2017 18:23, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 02/16/17 17:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 16/02/2017 17:30, Chad Joan wrote: Hello, This is a one-line patch to the configure script that will allow QEMU to be built on

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 16/02/2017 18:23, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 02/16/17 17:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 16/02/2017 17:30, Chad Joan wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> This is a one-line patch to the configure script that will allow QEMU to be >>> built on musl-libc based Linux systems. This problem is only

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 16/02/2017 18:23, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> can you explain exactly which function is missing without >> -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500? If it is curses' wide-char functions, why does it >> fail with musl but not with glibc? Is _XOPEN_SOURCE always defined by >> glibc if you have _D_GNU_SOURCE?

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On Thu, 02/16 12:47, Chad Joan wrote: > I am glad others are chiming in and might provide better solutions. > > Honestly, following the instructions at > http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch to-the-letter is quite > daunting to me, just to get one line of code changed. It might

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

I am glad others are chiming in and might provide better solutions. Honestly, following the instructions at http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch to-the-letter is quite daunting to me, just to get one line of code changed. It might help if that page had some kind of dead-simple

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 02/16/17 17:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 16/02/2017 17:30, Chad Joan wrote: >> Hello, >> >> This is a one-line patch to the configure script that will allow QEMU to be >> built on musl-libc based Linux systems. This problem is only noticeable >> when QEMU is built with --enable-curses.

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 16 February 2017 at 16:30, Chad Joan wrote: > Hello, > > This is a one-line patch to the configure script that will allow QEMU to be > built on musl-libc based Linux systems. This problem is only noticeable > when QEMU is built with --enable-curses. > > Detailed reading

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix build break during configuration on musl-libc based Linux systems.

On 02/16/2017 10:30 AM, Chad Joan wrote: > Hello, > > This is a one-line patch to the configure script that will allow QEMU to be > built on musl-libc based Linux systems. This problem is only noticeable > when QEMU is built with --enable-curses. > > Detailed reading material if you want to