Blue Swirl wrote:
[snip]
Index: qemu/linux-user/mipsn32/syscall.h
===
--- qemu.orig/linux-user/mipsn32/syscall.h2007-10-11 19:17:14.0
+
+++ qemu/linux-user/mipsn32/syscall.h 2007-10-11 19:17:46.0 +
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 10/12/07, Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blue Swirl wrote:
[snip]
Index: qemu/linux-user/mipsn32/syscall.h
===
--- qemu.orig/linux-user/mipsn32/syscall.h2007-10-11
19:17:14.0
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode emulation.
[...]
Are you sure it
On 10/11/07, Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits
Blue Swirl wrote:
[snip]
I would think this feature will be limited to platforms which can handle
32bit and 64bit binaries with a single personality.
I am not sure it is a common case !
However, I suggest to emulate a 32 bit user linux system with a 64 bit
guest CPU running in
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 22:26 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
On 10/10/07, Fabrice Bellard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32
J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode emulation.
[...]
Are you sure it is a good idea to try to add 32 bit executable support
to a 64 bit
On 10/10/07, J. Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode emulation.
First of all, the personality was never set to PER_LINUX32
On 10/10/07, Fabrice Bellard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode emulation.
[...]
Are you sure it is a good
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode emulation.
[...]
Are you sure it is a good idea to try to add 32 bit
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 19:01 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
On 10/10/07, J. Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode emulation.
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode emulation.
[...]
Are you sure it is a good idea to try to
On 10/10/07, Fabrice Bellard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32 bits executables to run on 64
bits target in linux user mode
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 22:02 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
On 10/10/07, Fabrice Bellard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
J. Mayer wrote:
Following the patches done for elfload32, it appeared to me that there
were still problems that would prevent 32
14 matches
Mail list logo
