On Tuesday 12 February 2008 05:57:18 Ian Jackson wrote:
hg is much better. OTOH it does have one severe problem: it expects
you to check in before merging, which is the opposite of what cvs
users expect. A cvs refugee, or anyone working on a project whose
leaders don't like merge changesets
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 07:57:50 Marius Groeger wrote:
The attached patch fixes the problem, but I have to admit I can't tell
for sure if this doesn't break other things (such as qemu's built-in
GDB server). Could some QEMU ppc expert please
On Feb 13, 2008 10:22 AM, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 05:57:18 Ian Jackson wrote:
hg is much better. OTOH it does have one severe problem: it expects
you to check in before merging, which is the opposite of what cvs
users expect. A cvs refugee, or
Apparently I write in a spamy way.
There's no contact for these kinds of issues, so I'm sending this here, sorry.
-- Forwarded message --
From: mailserver
Date: Feb 13, 2008 11:24 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [Qemu-devel] What does code_copy_enabled do?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDaemon
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:46:44AM +0100, Marius Groeger wrote:
if ((tb-pc TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == (dest TARGET_PAGE_MASK)
!ctx-singlestep_enabled) {
..
} else {
gen_set_T1(dest);
#if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
if (ctx-sf_mode)
gen_op_b_T1_64();
else
#endif
Hello,
I am not sure if this should be treated as an error or not (it
definitely isn't critical), but I'll post it as an extra information
if it is useful or you think it should be fixed.
According to Intel manuals, the FXSAVE instruction requires the
argument to be 16-byte aligned. On a real
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
I am not sure if this should be treated as an error or not (it
definitely isn't critical), but I'll post it as an extra information
if it is useful or you think it should be fixed.
According to Intel manuals, the FXSAVE instruction requires
I wonder if this patch makes sense, using SIGALRM for all kinds of
timers, even those expiring through a file descriptor?
It seems more clean to me to always use SIGALRM for alarms, but the
actual trigger for this change was to free up SIGIO for KVM.
Unfortunately, I have been unable to test it
Hi,
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2008/02/13/msg000124.html
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-bugs/2008/02/13/msg001312.html
This looked like this in QEMU 0.9.1:
0x80115260: cmp%gs:0x2d4,%edi
0x80115268: jae0x80115288
IN:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 04:52:22PM +0100, Marius Groeger wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 09:46:44AM +0100, Marius Groeger wrote:
if ((tb-pc TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == (dest TARGET_PAGE_MASK)
!ctx-singlestep_enabled) {
No, if you've
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
The else block will be entered if !A, or if A B.
Yeah - oops - sorry :-)
Regards
Marius
--
Marius Groeger
SYSGO AG Embedded and Real-Time Software
Voice: +49 6136 9948 0 FAX: +49 6136 9948 10
www.sysgo.com |
11 matches
Mail list logo
