On 1/10/22 19:15, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
This is the first series of the exception model-specific changes. I
intend to keep this same structure for the rest of the exception
models.
== preparation ==
First few patches are cleanups specific to this model. This comes
first because I'm using some
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 2:33 AM Eric DeVolder wrote:
>
> Ani, an inline response below.
> Thanks!
> eric
>
> On 12/10/21 08:09, Ani Sinha wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 11:24 PM Eric DeVolder
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Ani, inline responses below. eric
> >>
> >> On 12/9/21 00:29, Ani Sinha wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 07:09, Zhang Chen wrote:
>
> To record screencast, AVAssetWriter APIs were called for each
> cocoa_update call.
>
> Commands for start/stop recording were added to View menu.
This seems a bit of an odd feature -- why doesn't the OS just
permit screen recording of any
The clang in Ubuntu 18.04 (10.0.0-4ubuntu1) produces a warning
on the code added in commit f5ef0e518d03 where we use a
shifted expression in a boolean context:
../../linux-user/elfload.c:2423:16: error: converting the result of '<<' to a
boolean always evaluates to true
Hello Troy,
+
+memory_region_init_io(>iomem, OBJECT(s), _i3c_ops, s,
+TYPE_ASPEED_I3C, ASPEED_I3C_NR_REGS << 2);
+
+sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, >iomem);
I would add a container region containing all the regions :
memory_region_init(>iomem_container, OBJECT(s),
Hi Akihiko
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 7:30 AM Akihiko Odaki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found this brings an inconsistency and a flaw to scanout semantics and
> think the inconsistency should be fixed or this should be reverted
> before the next release comes up.
>
> The inconsistency is in the handling
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 07:01, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> Le 10/01/2022 à 20:17, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> > The clang in Ubuntu 18.04 (10.0.0-4ubuntu1) produces a warning
> > on the code added in commit f5ef0e518d03 where we use a
> > shifted expression in a boolean context:
> >
> >
On 01/10/22 13:09, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 1/10/2022 7:01 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
If you go without pflash, then you likely will not have a
standards-conformant UEFI variable store. (Unless you reimplement
the variable arch protocols in edk2 on top of something else than
the
301 - 308 of 308 matches
Mail list logo