John Morris wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:18, Joe Lee wrote:
I appreciate the effort that some are making to develop a GUI for QEMU -
There's a few project I see that trying to achieve this. But, I wish
they all could come together and work together to develop a nice GUI. I
w
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:18, Joe Lee wrote:
> I appreciate the effort that some are making to develop a GUI for QEMU -
> There's a few project I see that trying to achieve this. But, I wish
> they all could come together and work together to develop a nice GUI. I
> would like to see a sub-proje
On Thursday 15 June 2006 23:31, Joe Lee wrote:
> I glad to see many people sharing comments and making suggestions since
> this thread topic started. I seems there enough interest to have a
> GUI-Frontend for QEMU. I am hopeful this can lead to getting something
> started.
>
> I'd like to see a pol
Rick Vernam wrote:
QEMU leaves me with very few 'itches to be scratched' ...
The basic tasks that a QUI should confine itself to, IMO, are already pretty
darn easy - define/manage a VM (via a shell script for me), start it, stop
it, pause it...etc..
Even so, I've been thinking about this for
QEMU leaves me with very few 'itches to be scratched' ...
The basic tasks that a QUI should confine itself to, IMO, are already pretty
darn easy - define/manage a VM (via a shell script for me), start it, stop
it, pause it...etc..
Even so, I've been thinking about this for some time - months pr
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
VNC is a good idea... But isn't it a bit "laggy" for this purpose? I
think people accept a laggy mouse cursor in a VNC window that comes over
the network, but won't really accept that in virtual machine that's
running directly on their desktop. OTOH, I'm no VNC expert :)
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:33:26AM +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 05:52:14PM -0500, John Morris wrote:
> > With the new VNC server capability there is no need to embed the emulator's
> > existing window. You can just have a GTK/QT widget which
Oliver Gerlich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
VNC is a good idea... But isn't it a bit "laggy" for this purpose? I
think people accept a laggy mouse cursor in a VNC window that comes over
the network, but won't really accept that in virtual machine that's
running directl
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 05:52:14PM -0500, John Morris wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 17:29, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
If you are familiar with Tcl/Tk, maybe you could give some hints on how
to embed the Qemu window into such an app?
Embedding the emulator's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
>
>
>>Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
>>>
>>>
BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
GUI-Fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel P. Berrange schrieb:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 05:52:14PM -0500, John Morris wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 17:29, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
>>
>>
>>>If you are familiar with Tcl/Tk, maybe you could give some hints on how
>>>to embed the Qemu win
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 05:52:14PM -0500, John Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 17:29, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
>
> > If you are familiar with Tcl/Tk, maybe you could give some hints on how
> > to embed the Qemu window into such an app?
>
> Embedding the emulator's window might not be the best
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
> >
> >>BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
> >>GUI-Frontend for QEMU that would be comparable to VMware. How much man
> >>hours would this like
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 17:29, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> If you are familiar with Tcl/Tk, maybe you could give some hints on how
> to embed the Qemu window into such an app?
Embedding the emulator's window might not be the best way to attack the
problem. Especially since you would need to be able to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
>
>
>>BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
>>GUI-Frontend for QEMU that would be comparable to VMware. How much man
>>hours would this likely
gmake -C mips-softmmu all
gmake[1]: Entering directory
`/home/jonathan/experimental/qemu-snapshot-2006-06-15_23/mips-softmmu'
gcc -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -mcpu=ultrasparc -m32 -ffixed-g2
-ffixed-g3 -fno-delayed-branch -fno-omit-frame-pointer -ffixed-i0
-fno-reorder-blocks -fno-optimize-s
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
You're right! However, as Julian pointed out: it is less than fascinating to
work on a GUI, _especially_ if it is for the masses who tend to criticize
without contributing*Footnote 1*.
I am not sure I agree if that t
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
GUI-Frontend for QEMU that would be comparable to VMware. How much man
hours would this likely take?
I do not know VMware. Anybody? I would be intere
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
> BTW, I am curious to know how much would it cost to develop a good
> GUI-Frontend for QEMU that would be comparable to VMware. How much man
> hours would this likely take?
I do not know VMware. Anybody? I would be interested, too, to know how
complica
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
> >
> > You're right! However, as Julian pointed out: it is less than fascinating to
> > work on a GUI, _especially_ if it is for the masses who tend to criticize
> > without contributing*Footnote 1*.
>
> I am not sure I agree if that thought. It really de
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
Your right! the keyword is "some" but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a quality GUI-Frontend.
WaxDragon wrote:
On 6/15/06, Joe Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good point on that, BUT it's not just about the GUI. It's about an
"easy" way to install the product and run a given app without the need
to create/setup a VM - To me that is the benefit of the VMware player.
However, not much of a
You're right! However, as Julian pointed out: it is less than fascinating
to work on a GUI, _especially_ if it is for the masses who tend to
criticize without contributing*Footnote 1*.
I am not sure I agree if that thought. It really depends on the mission
or goal of the project. In the case f
On 6/15/06, Joe Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good point on that, BUT it's not just about the GUI. It's about an
"easy" way to install the product and run a given app without the need
to create/setup a VM - To me that is the benefit of the VMware player.
However, not much of a big benefit IF QEM
Good point on that, BUT it's not just about the GUI. It's about an
"easy" way to install the product and run a given app without the need
to create/setup a VM - To me that is the benefit of the VMware player.
However, not much of a big benefit IF QEMU is made easy to install and
has a nice GUI
Hi,
This patchset contains the following fixes to Sparc64 target:
gdbstub.c: added 'p' protocol support to bypass the broken 'g' protocol, fix
off-by-one error in register numbering, allow 64-bit breakpoints
hw/sun4u.c: fixed broken VGA, switch to Cirrus
target-sparc/translate.c: mulx and udivx
Julian Seward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:18, WaxDragon wrote:
>> On 6/15/06, kadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:10 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
>> > Real world, gui's are just so easy & desirable, especially if the gui is
>> > consistent a
Joe Lee wrote:
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
Your right! the keyword is "some" but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a quality
GUI-Frontend. However the CLI can always be in place for those who want
and p
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Joe Lee wrote:
> > Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
> Your right! the keyword is "some" but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
> adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a quality GUI-Frontend.
You're right! However, as Julian
Some of us appriciate the fact that qemu has no "GUI" per se. ;0)
Your right! the keyword is "some" but not all. I think if QEMU is to be
adopted by the masses it will need to come up with a quality
GUI-Frontend. However the CLI can always be in place for those who want
and prefer to use it. O
Hi,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Julian Seward wrote:
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:18, WaxDragon wrote:
> > On 6/15/06, kadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:10 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> > > Real world, gui's are just so easy & desirable, especially if the gui is
> > > con
On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:18, WaxDragon wrote:
> On 6/15/06, kadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:10 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> > Real world, gui's are just so easy & desirable, especially if the gui is
> > consistent across os's, and part of the original distro. I t
On 6/15/06, kadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:10 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
Real world, gui's are just so easy & desirable, especially if the gui is
consistent across os's, and part of the original distro. I think
take-up would be huge (well huge-er, current takeup is h
Am 14.06.2006 um 21:53 schrieb Ed Swierk:
On 6/5/06, René Korthaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I researched current qemu cvs and found out that the patch was
integrated not complete but to 95%. There are two lines in slirp/
misc.c that need a change (patch attached). Tested to work with Mac
OS
Updated patch against CVS HEAD
bye
Frediano Ziglio
close.diff
Description: close.diff
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Attached updated patch (this time against CVS HEAD)
bye
Frediano Ziglio
PS: Thanks for apply my patches
>
> At least the default should be sparse files if the filesystem
> supports them.
>
> Fabrice.
>
> ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
> > Good question. As you like... I can remove option i
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:17 +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> OK for this patch, but the following must be changed:
>
> 1) All instances of strcpy and strncpy must be replaced by pstrcpy.
>
> 2) product_name_size must be passed as parameter to usb_host_find_device().
lo. Attached is something
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 18:10 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> Btw. regarding your earlier question about a Qemu GUI similar to VMware:
> AFAIK at least two people have posted GUI patches for Qemu (look in the
> mailing list archive); so far there has been little response to that,
> and I suppose t
38 matches
Mail list logo
