G'day all.
Has anyone managed to get Win2k or XP reliably running with acpi and kqemu?
I get random errors usually related to memory access according to the blue
screens.
Without ACPI it runs ok.. and without kqemu it runs ok.
I can not (and I've been trying hard) managed to reproduce any
Hi!
I'm trying to utilize kqemu on my vserver setup. I'm using distro's qemu
0.8.2 (ALT) which has couple of patches applied (I may list them) and
vanilla kqemu 1.3.0pre9.
Now, after 'modprobe kqemu' I start qemu with
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -kernel-kqemu -cdrom
Hi
Resending fixed patch, mirror fix in glue(stfi, MEMSUFFIX) function; bitwise typo:
instead of .
Tom Marn
Patch which appends optional stfiwx PowerPC instruction into QEMU.
Mirror fix of patch: 2006-10-11 : bitwise typo instead
Tom Marn
--- target-ppc/translate.c.orig 2006-10-11
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Paul Brook wrote:
IMHO there's nothing particularly good about sparc for teaching assembly
(Whoever thought register windows were a good idea!).
The goal is not about assembly but programmer view of
a processor architecture using a mix of C and a little assembly.
Stupid bug, here is one working when not using -snapshot
Index: hw/cdrom.c
===
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/hw/cdrom.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 cdrom.c
--- hw/cdrom.c 25 May 2006 23:58:51 - 1.1
+++ hw/cdrom.c 11
Sounds like you just want a bare-metal cross. There's absolutely no reason
to
run the editor, compiler or assembler on the target machine.
Many targets even have gdb simulators (MIPS, ARM and PPC do).
I disagree, it's much easier to use a native compiler than to build a cross
compiler, even
Blue Swirl wrote:
BTW, we could easily design and implement an ideal CPU just for Qemu
purposes. It could be unlike any existing hardware, for example with
zero or thousands of registers. The problem would be making a compiler
for the CPU, also porting some OS to it. Any GCC and Linux guru
Blue Swirl wrote:
BTW, we could easily design and implement an ideal CPU just for Qemu
purposes. It could be unlike any existing hardware, for example with
zero or thousands of registers. The problem would be making a compiler
for the CPU, also porting some OS to it. Any GCC and Linux guru
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 19:32 +0200, Marco Matthies wrote:
Blue Swirl wrote:
BTW, we could easily design and implement an ideal CPU just for Qemu
purposes. It could be unlike any existing hardware, for example with
zero or thousands of registers. The problem would be making a compiler
On 10/11/06 08:41, Brad Campbell wrote:
Has anyone managed to get Win2k or XP reliably running with acpi and kqemu?
I get random errors usually related to memory access according to the
blue screens.
Without ACPI it runs ok.. and without kqemu it runs ok.
Same here.
The solution for me
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Blue Swirl wrote:
BTW, we could easily design and implement an ideal CPU just for Qemu
purposes.
This s reminds me of Java.
Ciao,
Dscho
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
BTW, we could easily design and implement an ideal CPU just for Qemu
purposes.
This s reminds me of Java.
Except that Java VM is not suitable target for all classes of programming
languages, like C.
_
Express yourself
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
This s reminds me of Java.
Or lisp.
:-).
--rich
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Blue Swirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, we could easily design and implement an ideal CPU just for Qemu
purposes.
This s reminds me of Java.
Except that Java VM is not suitable target for all classes of programming
languages, like C.
I wondered if you could use the
14 matches
Mail list logo
