Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Is there a way to compile qemu-cvs-snapshot under Solaris-10 running
on amd64 processor?
-ishwar
Take that:
http://www.martux.org/qemu/XXX__qemu-0.8.2-solaris__20061010x11_g.tar.gz
or
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu/downloads/qemu-0.8.2-solaris.tar.gz
Eric Lowe wrote:
Is there a way to compile qemu-cvs-snapshot under Solaris-10 running
on amd64 processor?
Check out the sources and instructions at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu
There are some patches for 64-bit builds that I think still need to be
committed to the main
Hello all,
I have recently installed the latest linux kernel, and i have been
having problems with the tap interface since.
I have been getting the following cryptic message:
warning: could not configure /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation
Could not initialize device 'tap'
The tun driver
This came up in IRC a few days ago, it seems you need to use the UML
util 'tunctl' to assign permissions to the tap device. I found this
change annoying.
On 10/13/06, G Portokalidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I have recently installed the latest linux kernel, and i have been
having
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
/usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with ldd).
What is the way out
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
/usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
(32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?)
(should go under /usr/local/lib/amd64/libSDL-1.2.so.0)
Well, the problem is I do not root privileges so
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
(32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version
needed?)
(should go under /usr/local/lib/amd64/libSDL-1.2.so.0)
Well, the problem is I do
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
Ben Taylor wrote:
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but make always generates binaries that want to find
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Also, I downloaded the SDL-1.2.11 source from opensolaris.org download
page. I can't figure out how to apply the 64bit patch (patch rejects
the diffs, a visual inspection shows that patch is already applied to the
source?)
-ishwar
Manually applying a patch will
Ben Taylor wrote:
As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
My answer had been a bit longer:
Read ld.so.1(1)
i.e.
# man ld.so.1
Then: *One* option is to set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or potentially
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 18:20, Blue Swirl wrote:
Sounds like you just want a bare-metal cross. There's absolutely no reason
to
run the editor, compiler or assembler on the target machine.
Many targets even have gdb simulators (MIPS, ARM and PPC do).
I disagree, it's much easier to use a
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor wrote:
As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
My answer had been a bit longer:
Read ld.so.1(1)
i.e.
# man ld.so.1
Then: *One*
Ben Taylor wrote:
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor wrote:
As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
My answer had been a bit longer:
Read ld.so.1(1)
i.e.
# man
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor wrote:
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
is fine
but
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
(32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?)
(should go under
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
I think the SDL source I downloaded is already prepatched.
See the diff file below: my assumption is that --- indicates the
original file and +++ the patched version (I might be wrong
here). So, line in file with - in first column is reference to
original file and is
Ben Taylor wrote:
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote:
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ?
(32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?)
(should go under
Ben Taylor wrote:
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Taylor wrote:
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
./configure --libdir=other-path
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Hello,
uploading gdiff and sparc-pkg to www.martux.org/qemu/RELEASES/sparc and
to the opensolaris site.
In a few minutes.
Ouch, file too big:
File 1 (SUNWqemu-0.8.2,REV=2006.10.14-sol8-sparc-opt.pkg.gz) was
ignored. The file size is 28080k, which exceeds the maximum
22 matches
Mail list logo
