Hello,
My plans are to use qemu's arm system emulation for u-boot demonstration
and education purposes:
* In my embeded Linux training sessions, to practice with U-boot
without having to carry real boards, with their cables and power
supplies (which would definitely make customs
Hi,
On 27/10/06, Michael Opdenacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* In my embeded Linux training sessions, to practice with U-boot
without having to carry real boards, with their cables and power
supplies (which would definitely make customs officers frown and
think I'm
If you want to put a negative number in a char you must use a signed char.
Andreas.
Index: fpu/softfloat-native.c
===
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/fpu/softfloat-native.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -a -p -r1.5
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Andreas Schwab wrote:
If you want to put a negative number in a char you must use a signed char.
It has been a really long time I have been working on a broken system that
did not default to signed. Just out of curiosity: what system did you
see the breakage on?
On 27/10/06, Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Andreas Schwab wrote:
It has been a really long time I have been working on a broken system that
did not default to signed. Just out of curiosity: what system did you
see the breakage on?
AFAIK, it's not a broken
You can try:
$: mkfifo command
$: qemu -serial pipe:command debian
Hope it helps
Le Lundi 23 Octobre 2006 13:41, TheMoon Seeker a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to manage VM from the host by using the -serial pipe. I try
this but that doesn't work:
$: mknode command
$: qemu -serial
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It has been a really long time I have been working on a broken system that
did not default to signed.
The only thing that is broken is your knowlege of C.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH,
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andreas Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: It has been a really long time I have been working on a broken system that
: did not default to signed.
:
: The only thing that is broken is your knowlege of
Specifying the u-boot image as a kernel will place it at the location the
kernel is expected to run. I'm not sure that's what you intended since
u-boot is usually place in flash to magically run on power up.
I noticed with the versatile board at least that the kernel address is fixed
so if you
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 6:01:48 PM, you wrote:
Oh, c'mon, Rob! I really didn't want to ask Paul Brook that, but
sure you'll fix my cluelessness right here, right now - tell me, tell me,
why Linux has dynamic-loadable modules support, which clueless passers-by
like me call
Hello Rob,
Thursday, October 26, 2006, 5:31:46 PM, you wrote:
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 11:01 am, Paul Brook wrote:
Oh, c'mon, Rob! I really didn't want to ask Paul Brook that, but
sure you'll fix my cluelessness right here, right now - tell me, tell me,
why Linux has
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It has been a really long time I have been working on a broken system that
did not default to signed.
The only thing that is broken is your knowlege of C.
Okay.
And what system did you
It has been a really long time I have been working on a broken system
that did not default to signed.
The only thing that is broken is your knowlege of C.
Okay.
And what system did you encounter this behaviour on?
Common arm, ppc, s390 and mips systems all have default char as
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Hi,
:
: On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Andreas Schwab wrote:
:
: Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:
: It has been a really long time I have been working on a broken system
that
: did not default
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It has been a really long time I have been working on a broken system
that
did not default to signed.
The only thing that is broken is your knowlege of
Linux has genuine reasons for wanting modules.
Kernel size is important because (a) it has to be loaded by the
bootloader, often from a small, slow device (eg. floppy, flash or
network).
(b) The whole kernel is permanently locked into ram. It you've ever tried
to build a kernel with
Hello Paul,
Ummm, I must be representing my ideas somewhat unclear... ;-)
Saturday, October 28, 2006, 3:08:20 AM, you wrote:
[]
Thanks for your response. But I hope none of us take the discussion
too seriously to consider the arguments like above are all-convincing.
They can be
17 matches
Mail list logo
