Le 29/12/2009 21:49, Kevin Wolf a écrit :
You need to really resize the L1 table and not just extend the
l1_size in the
qcow2 header. And don't use the script with snapshots. VM state is saved
after the end of the virtual disk, so if you extend the disk it might
overlap
the VM state (you
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Knowing ioapic configuration is very useful for the poor soles
how need to debug guest occasionally.
+static struct IOAPICState *ioapic;
Ugly. I really think the monitor interface needs to be changed to take
an opaque
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:05:10 +0200
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:01:28PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Knowing ioapic configuration is very useful for the poor soles
how need to debug guest
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:45:08 +0200
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 06:49:14PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:49:53 +0200
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 03:39:29PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 29
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 05:01:38PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think it's a good idea to use the mailing list whenever possible.
Likewise, if you see a patch go in that you think would have benefited
from being on the list, point it out.
Sometimes it would have benefited *others* if
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:50:43 +0200
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
I am starring to learn this QObject kung-fu.
Nice, you really got how to do it. Just two minor comments.
One question:
Why qlist_iter(..., func, ...) and not
FOREACH_QOBJ() {
do things
}
Well, when I started
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:19:30AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:50:43 +0200
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
I am starring to learn this QObject kung-fu.
Nice, you really got how to do it. Just two minor comments.
One question:
Why qlist_iter(..., func,
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:01:28 +
Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Knowing ioapic configuration is very useful for the poor soles
how need to debug guest occasionally.
+static struct IOAPICState *ioapic;
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:22:19 +0200
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
+void do_info_ioapic(Monitor *mon, QObject **ret_data)
+{
+int i;
+QList *list;
+
+*ret_data = NULL;
+
+if (!ioapic)
+return;
+
+list = qlist_new();
+
+for
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:16:30AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/30/2009 03:27 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:00:09PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/24/2009 09:02 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Knowing ioapic configuration is very useful for the poor soles
how need to
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 04:26:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:16:30AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/30/2009 03:27 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:00:09PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/24/2009 09:02 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Knowing
Am 29.12.2009 um 22:07 schrieb Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:09:17PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
Test environment:
* ppc-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc running on x86_64 host
* emulated ppc is running debian lenny
While debugging on the emulated ppc (each time
On 12/30/2009 01:50 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Knowing ioapic configuration is very useful for the poor soles
how need to debug guest occasionally.
+
+void do_info_ioapic(Monitor *mon, QObject **ret_data)
+{
+int i;
+QList *list;
+
+*ret_data = NULL;
+
+if (!ioapic)
+return;
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 05:04:08PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/30/2009 01:50 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Knowing ioapic configuration is very useful for the poor soles
how need to debug guest occasionally.
+
+void do_info_ioapic(Monitor *mon, QObject **ret_data)
+{
+int i;
+QList
On Tuesday 29 December 2009 13:24:36 Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Is the -balloon virtio parameter passed on the command-line?
# grep balloon /usr/local/var/log/libvirt/qemu/* | wc -l
0
These logs include some history - so the parameter isn't used by libvirt
even when ballooning works?
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 01:51:36PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Add generic support for debugging consoles (simple I/O ports which
when written to cause debugging output to be written to a target.)
The current implementation matches Bochs' port 0xe9, allowing the same
debugging code to be used
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 06:32:14PM +0100, Laurent Desnogues wrote:
@@ -370,13 +385,21 @@ uint32_t do_arm_semihosting(CPUState *env)
return syscall_err;
#endif
case SYS_GET_CMDLINE:
-#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
- /* Build a commandline from the original argv. */
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 03:39:32PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 29.12.2009 um 22:07 schrieb Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:09:17PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
Test environment:
* ppc-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc running on x86_64 host
* emulated ppc is running
From: Daniel Jacobowitz d...@codesourcery.com
This patch improves ARM semihosting to the point where qemu-system-arm
can simulate cc1 from GCC. It can't simulate GCC itself, which
requires POSIXy bits like execve, but the backend works, including the
preprocessor.
* Use -kernel and -append for
Am 30.12.2009 um 18:46 schrieb Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 03:39:32PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 29.12.2009 um 22:07 schrieb Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:09:17PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
Test environment:
*
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
From: Daniel Jacobowitz d...@codesourcery.com
This patch improves ARM semihosting to the point where qemu-system-arm
can simulate cc1 from GCC. It can't simulate GCC itself, which
requires POSIXy bits like execve, but the backend works, including the
preprocessor.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 06:38:16PM +, Jamie Lokier wrote:
I see that you didn't start the semihosting support, but what's the
purpose of it? Why would you use it to run programs like cc1 instead
of qemu-arm, the user mode simulation?
You use it to run an arm-none-eabi cc1, not an
On 12/30/2009 08:30 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 04:26:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:16:30AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/30/2009 03:27 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:00:09PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On
On 12/30/2009 08:26 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:16:30AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/30/2009 03:27 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:00:09PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/24/2009 09:02 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Knowing ioapic configuration
On 12/30/2009 09:58 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/30/2009 05:53 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
This assumes there is only one ioapic. While I don't think there's
a good reason to add more (the one we have is causing sufficient
trouble), I suggest returning an array of ioapics (or include
gsibase: [{
On 12/30/2009 06:13 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 02:08:27PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:05:10 +0200
Gleb Natapovg...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:01:28PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Gleb
Hi,
few months ago Pierre Riteau reported regression of exec migration in qemu.
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-08/msg01557.html)
There was some discussion, but there is no clear conclusion.
Today, I tried qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2 and migration is still very slow (using
libvirt save
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 04:49:01PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/30/2009 08:26 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:16:30AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/30/2009 03:27 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:00:09PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 04:47:45PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/30/2009 08:30 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 04:26:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:16:30AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/30/2009 03:27 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Dec
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 05:04:53PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/30/2009 09:58 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/30/2009 05:53 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
This assumes there is only one ioapic. While I don't think there's
a good reason to add more (the one we have is causing sufficient
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 05:07:14PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 12/30/2009 06:13 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 02:08:27PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:05:10 +0200
Gleb Natapovg...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:01:28PM +, Blue
A variant of write(2) which handles partial write.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name
---
osdep.c | 27 +++
qemu-common.h |1 +
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/osdep.c b/osdep.c
index e4836e7..d2406f2 100644
CCposix-aio-compat.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
posix-aio-compat.c: In function 'aio_signal_handler':
posix-aio-compat.c:505: error: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
make: *** [posix-aio-compat.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Kirill A.
CCblock/cow.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
block/cow.c: In function 'cow_create':
block/cow.c:251: error: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
block/cow.c:253: error: ignoring return value of 'ftruncate', declared with
attribute
CCblock/qcow.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
block/qcow.c: In function 'qcow_create':
block/qcow.c:804: error: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
block/qcow.c:806: error: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with
attribute
CCblock/vmdk.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
block/vmdk.c: In function 'vmdk_snapshot_create':
block/vmdk.c:236: error: ignoring return value of 'ftruncate', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
block/vmdk.c: In function 'vmdk_create':
block/vmdk.c:775: error: ignoring return
CCblock/vvfat.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
block/vvfat.c: In function 'commit_one_file':
block/vvfat.c:2259: error: ignoring return value of 'ftruncate', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
make: *** [block/vvfat.o] Error 1
CCblock/vvfat.o
In file included from
CCblock/qcow2.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
block/qcow2.c: In function 'qcow_create2':
block/qcow2.c:829: error: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
block/qcow2.c:838: error: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with
attribute
CCusb-linux.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
usb-linux.c: In function 'usb_host_read_file':
usb-linux.c:1204: error: ignoring return value of 'fgets', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
make: *** [usb-linux.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name
CCnet/slirp.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
net/slirp.c: In function 'slirp_smb_cleanup':
net/slirp.c:470: error: ignoring return value of 'system', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
make: *** [net/slirp.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name
---
CCi386-softmmu/vl.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/vl.c: In function 'qemu_event_increment':
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/vl.c:3404: error: ignoring return value of
'write', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
CCi386-softmmu/monitor.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/monitor.c: In function 'do_memory_save':
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/monitor.c:1318: error: ignoring return value of
'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
CCi386-linux-user/mmap.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/linux-user/mmap.c: In function 'mmap_frag':
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/linux-user/mmap.c:253: error: ignoring return
value of 'pread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
_FORTIFY_SOURCE is a Glibc feature which adds memory and string function
protection.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name
---
configure |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index 18aed43..0cdcdb3 100755
--- a/configure
-fstack-protector-all emit extra code to check for buffer overflows,
such as stack smashing attacks. This is done by adding a guard
variable to functions with vulnerable objects.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name
---
configure |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
A variant of write(2) which handles partial write.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name
---
osdep.c | 27 +++
qemu-common.h |1 +
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
CCblock/qcow.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
block/qcow.c: In function 'qcow_create':
block/qcow.c:804: error: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result
block/qcow.c:806: error: ignoring return
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
CCi386-softmmu/vl.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/vl.c: In function 'qemu_event_increment':
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/qemu-0.11.92/vl.c:3404: error: ignoring return value of
'write', declared with
john cooper wrote:
{
+.name = Merom,
+.level = 2,
+.vendor1 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_1,
+.vendor2 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_2,
+.vendor3 = CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_3,
+.family = 6, /* P6 */
+.model = 2,
+.stepping = 3,
+
On 12/31/2009 12:46 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I wasn't worried about that, only the increased code duplication.
I wasn't thinking there would be an info ioapic command but rather a
generic device-info command that would work with any qdev device. No
code duplication (in fact, much, much
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 4:00 AM, malc av1...@comtv.ru wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
A variant of write(2) which handles partial write.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name
---
osdep.c | 27 +++
qemu-common.h | 1
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 4:00 AM, malc av1...@comtv.ru wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
A variant of write(2) which handles partial write.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name
---
osdep.c |
On 12/31/2009 02:33 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
diff --git a/qemu-common.h b/qemu-common.h
index 8630f8c..a8144cb 100644
--- a/qemu-common.h
+++ b/qemu-common.h
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ void qemu_mutex_lock_iothread(void);
void qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(void);
int qemu_open(const char *name,
On 12/31/2009 02:33 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
+ snprintf((char*)entry-name,8,QEMU VV);
+ snprintf((char*)entry-extension,3,FAT);
Wrong, the split should be QEMU VVF and AT. Even better, change it
to QEMU VVF and AT with a trailing space and use memcpy since it's
not a
54 matches
Mail list logo
